Google Docs vs. Discogs for record collection list

[Shelby]

3 minutes ago, Tidal Wave said:

I was using google docs for myself but posting to message boards, Facebook groups, depop, and Craigslist. 

Wow lol you've been posting too long to still be doing that welcome to sanity

[Scruffy...the janitor]

On December 2, 2017 at 12:00 PM, switch5150 said:

I had the same debate with myself about a month ago. I finally decided on Google Docs because I like the clean look of all the titles in one place. Discogs isn't awful, but I have quite a few older albums and I just want to list the label and color, rather than trying to look at the matrix to make sure I choose the correct press and whatnot. I also didn't want to have to create a new listing if something isn't on Discogs.

 

I guess it really boils down to me being lazy, and Google Docs let me stay that way.

I completely retract this statement. Reading though your reasons for using Discogs and the whole barcode scanner in the App has made me abandon Google Docs and join the Discogs cult. 

[drds89]

Discogs, and at home Excel spreadsheet for date ordered, arrived, price and shipping cost, and any sold get moved down to the bottom.  Also a Word document for orders outstanding, and another document for where my stuff is on the shelves or in the crypt lol.

[toxicity]

I use both, but Docs is my 100% up-to-date collection.  I'm entering more and more stuff into Discogs as I get it, but it's highly unlikely that I'll ever go back through and enter my entire collection there.