shamrocks Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 any way to know if there are any clears left? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apirk Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 According to the site they are sold out of clear Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badabsentee Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Doesn't look like they have anymore. They took down the "First 300 orders get it on clear," on the order page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shamrocks Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 thanks, ill just pick up the regular at my local store i suppose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzilla Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Just got this today and it sounds amazing! Though did they get sides 3 and 4 mixed around? I thought Fuzz War was supposed to be the last song. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warhenrecords Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Just got this today and it sounds amazing! Though did they get sides 3 and 4 mixed around? I thought Fuzz War was supposed to be the last song. I was wondering about that too. If that's the case, then my labels are messed up. And on the DL, Fuzz War is the last track. Either way, the record is fantastic. My clear copy came yesterday and I spend all afternoon blasting it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
degenerex Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 I love this album - although I think the one time I listened to Fuzz War is going to be my last. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synapsistapped Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 FYI, Castle Face has a limited colored edition of Ty's s/t record up for sale right now: Ty Segall's first record, the one man band lo-fi masterpiece that started it all.Limited edition of 200 (100 here, 100 that you can only get from Ty on tour) on A side WHITE, B side coke bottle green vinyl! Includes a download card! http://www.castlefac...limited-edition Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apirk Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Thanks for the link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warhenrecords Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Just ordered, thanks for the link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avl Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Yes, thanks! 5 left! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warhenrecords Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Ordered it yesterday, woke up this morning with a shipping confirmation email. Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apirk Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 looks like they pressed Live on Aisle 5 again on green limited to 200. http://www.southpawdistro.bigcartel.com/product/ty-segall-live-in-aisle-five-lp wonder if any of his others are getting repressed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synapsistapped Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 looks like they pressed Live on Aisle 5 again on green limited to 200. http://www.southpawd...n-aisle-five-lp wonder if any of his others are getting repressed Yeah, I saw that the other day and ordered it since I never bought that record. Here's what it looks like: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest realtalk Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 ^^^ In regards to "Live in Aisle 5", does this label belong in the "Bullshit Claims of Limited Pressings" thread? Seems originally there were 800 black and 200 pink. Now this green /200 was repressed this year. Not clear if more black were pressed or not. Taken from discogs, this was the original 2011 hype from the label: From Southpaw Records: "Over the summer Ty Segall played to a sold out crowd in San Francisco at the Southpaw one year anniversary party. Live in Aisle Five captures Ty in an amazing live set and includes ten classic Ty songs, one new song, and two killer cover songs! All recorded by Eric Bauer who was the mastermind behind Ty's latest effort "Melted" and he did a killer job! This release is a one time pressing of 1000 and includes a limited color vinyl version of 200!" Smells bullshitty to me. ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synapsistapped Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 ^^^ In regards to "Live in Aisle 5", does this label belong in the "Bullshit Claims of Limited Pressings" thread? Seems originally there were 800 black and 200 pink. Now this green /200 was repressed this year. Not clear if more black were pressed or not. Taken from discogs, this was the original 2011 hype from the label: From Southpaw Records: "Over the summer Ty Segall played to a sold out crowd in San Francisco at the Southpaw one year anniversary party. Live in Aisle Five captures Ty in an amazing live set and includes ten classic Ty songs, one new song, and two killer cover songs! All recorded by Eric Bauer who was the mastermind behind Ty's latest effort "Melted" and he did a killer job! This release is a one time pressing of 1000 and includes a limited color vinyl version of 200!" Smells bullshitty to me. ??? You've never seen a label initially say "one-time pressing" and then later press more? The original press has plain white labels while this repress has plain black labels if it really matters to you. So long as I can buy a new copy of a record I enjoy at a reasonable price, I don't care what color it is or how limited it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest realtalk Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 You've never seen a label initially say "one-time pressing" and then later press more? The original press has plain white labels while this repress has plain black labels if it really matters to you. So long as I can buy a new copy of a record I enjoy at a reasonable price, I don't care what color it is or how limited it is. Yup, I've seen labels do this and it is misleading and they should be called on it. I didn't name that other thread, but it is bullshit. The first press isn't even hard nor expensive to get dude. $16 bucks from redscroll and other places on discogs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synapsistapped Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 The first press isn't even hard nor expensive to get dude. I was speaking in general, not specifically about this record. Anyway, if that's the case, then why are you complaining? Because it decreases the demand/price of the pink edition? Good. Records should be listened to and enjoyed, not flipped. Anything to keep the prices low is a good thing. In the record world, this means multiple presses (which is very common with garage labels, by the way). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jared Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 I remember getting the pink by mistake, haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streetwaves Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 I was speaking in general, not specifically about this record. Anyway, if that's the case, then why are you complaining? Because it decreases the demand/price of the pink edition? Good. Records should be listened to and enjoyed, not flipped. Anything to keep the prices low is a good thing. In the record world, this means multiple presses (which is very common with garage labels, by the way). I think that if a label states that it's a one time pressing and then presses an additional run, there's something to complain about. It has nothing to due with diminishing the value of the first press and everything to do with the integrity of the label. Where do you get the idea that "garage labels" have multiple pressings? What is a "garage label"? And who are these labels that are running multiple pressings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synapsistapped Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 I think that if a label states that it's a one time pressing and then presses an additional run, there's something to complain about. It has nothing to due with diminishing the value of the first press and everything to do with the integrity of the label. Where do you get the idea that "garage labels" have multiple pressings? What is a "garage label"? And who are these labels that are running multiple pressings? So a label intends to press a certain amount of records as a one-off, but it sells well and there is still demand for the record. Why is a repress in that case a bad thing? Why is that bad integrity? The goal here should be supporting these bands and independent labels and actually listening to the music rather than stockpiling or flipping records based on value. Take the label In the Red for example. They keep almost everything in print. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streetwaves Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 So a label intends to press a certain amount of records as a one-off, but it sells well and there is still demand for the record. Why is a repress in that case a bad thing? Why is that bad integrity? The goal here should be supporting these bands and independent labels and actually listening to the music rather than stockpiling or flipping records based on value. Take the label In the Red for example. They keep almost everything in print. The idea that the label advertised one thing and then negated that statement with an additional pressing is a lack of integrity. Don't make the claim if you're not going to follow through. Do you really think that you're supporting the band by buying their records? How much do you think an indie band makes from record sales? You want to support a band---go see them live and buy a t-shirt. I buy records for listening---not for flipping or dust collecting. I'm also a collector and have a collector's mentality when it comes to limited pressings so I understand why someone would take issue with what has happened with this Ty Segall LP. In The Red doesn't keep almost everything in print---especially vinyl. Close to 1/3 of the catalog is out of print. The only thing I can think of that was repressed was The Consumers LP and Larry never said that he wouldn't repress it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avl Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Agreed. The simple solution here is to leave out the "one time pressing only", then everyone is happy. The buyer can purchase accordingly, and the label doesn't look like dick if/when they change their mind later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
konk Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 The label looks like dick when they say " one time pressing only" whether they repress or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest deathbydrums Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 The label looks like dick when they say " one time pressing only" whether they repress or not. disagree. when they say "one time pressing only" they are giving you fair warning that it won't be around again. this is precisely why it is shady to say that and then go and press more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.