Jump to content

Why vinyl?


Recommended Posts

Alright I will delete this if another thread already exists but I searched and I couldn't find anything so if I missed it, please let me know.

Anyways, I was reading this article today

http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/audio-designline-blog/4033509/Vinyl-vs-CD-myths-refuse-to-die

and it's not the first time that I've heard this argument brought up. It seems that CD quality matches vinyl quality which I didn't know.

My question for you guys, and I understand that I am recieving a biased response from a vinyl forum ;D, why vinyl? It's more expensive and harder to keep up so what are the advantages?

I've collected records for a while now because of my parents but in light of this new knowledge I was wondering if some of you guys that have been doing it much longer than I have could possibly shed some light on the issue for me.

So why vinyl?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My reasons probably differ from most on this board...

Me buying vinyl has nothing to do with the sound quality. Cds and records both sound good.

A good portion of the music I listen to is only released on vinyl. I started buying vinyl because there was music I wanted that wasn't available on cd. Eventually I switched over to primarily listening to vinyl, so that is the format I buy the most and the format I choose if there is an option. If a release is cd only, or cassette only... I still buy it.

I don't understand many people on this board who just seem to be buying their favorite cds on vinyl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My reasons probably differ from most on this board...

Me buying vinyl has nothing to do with the sound quality. Cds and records both sound good.

A good portion of the music I listen to is only released on vinyl. I started buying vinyl because there was music I wanted that wasn't available on cd. Eventually I switched over to primarily listening to vinyl, so that is the format I buy the most and the format I choose if there is an option. If a release is cd only, or cassette only... I still buy it.

I don't understand many people on this board who just seem to be buying their favorite cds on vinyl.

Alfred E Newman makes a lot of sense. Down with homework!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like having something tangible to hold, I love the packaging, the creativity that goes into a release in terms of linear notes, gate folds, special packaging..

I love listening to whole albums at one time, and I feel digital gives too much freedom to skip a song and move on to the next.

That, and like Kurtz said, a lot of bands now only release records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think listening to vinyl is more active and ritualistic than listening to digital formats. Records make demands on the listener, such as dropping the needle and flipping sides, hence keeping the listener physically engaged while listening. I think the vinyl format also does the visually artistic side of music moer justice in both cover and insert art, as well as creative color combinations for the record itself. I like digital for driving and working out, but I otherwise I find the whole process of listening to a record far more appealing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like owning physical copies of music. Was buying CDs for years and transferring it to my iPod but found no use for the CDs once that was said and done. Had a few 7" so I decided to buy a record player. Loved it. Found that some vinyl came with download codes or could be found online anyway and switched primarily to vinyl. Gave me a reason to pull out physical music and has its own sound advantages. No brainer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, I was just approached by a guy at Record Theatre with almost this same question.

I'm in a bad mood so I didn't give him as good a response as I should, but I simply talked about the aesthetic of it... for most people, CDs are outdated because of MP3s (or at least digital files like FLAC), so if you really want something tangible, a record is very appealing.

I love physical media. I have bookshelves overflowing with history books, econ books, novels, hockey books, coaching shit, graphic novels, but have no intention of ever buying a nook. That's my comparison. I like the OG format because it's tangible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like owning physical copies of music. Was buying CDs for years and transferring it to my iPod but found no use for the CDs once that was said and done. Had a few 7" so I decided to buy a record player. Loved it. Found that some vinyl came with download codes or could be found online anyway and switched primarily to vinyl. Gave me a reason to pull out physical music and has its own sound advantages. No brainer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the last viable physical form of music.

If you don't want to live in a download/mp3 world, vinyl is all that's left.

There are still CDs and they will be around awhile longer for bands who can't afford to do anything else, but they've been dying for a long time.

So what's left? Records.

Also as others have already said, it's more interactive, bigger nicer packaging, etc..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Along with everything that's already been said, I enjoy the collecting aspect. Limited releases make me "hunt" for records. I like knowing that I am one of only 999 other people that have the record. Countless thousands can buy a CD and infinite people can easily download. Makes me feel more connected with the music. On a similar note, the price of vinyl helps me purchase only the "essentials." I feel digital has pampered all of us.

That being said, I'm not a vinyl ecxlusive kind of guy. Digital/CDs definitely have their pros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started buying records because I was a poor college student making minimum wage and at the time ('98-'99) 7"s were in the $2-$3 range and lp's were $5-$6 from No Idea. While at the same time Record Town sold their CD's for $15-$17 which was ridiculous. CD's have dropped in price and records have increased but it's still my preferred medium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I used to buy CD's, I'd rip them onto my computer and then the CD would just get thrown in the corner. CD's are just outdated. In my car I listen to my iPod (or iPhone) and my generation almost always has an iPod dock or an aux input in the car so that you can listen to your iPod or Zune or whatever else you choose.

Vinyl makes music tangible to me. Being able to see the album artwork, the insert, the packaging... that whole thing is just cooler than CD's. Plus, with more and more records coming with a digital download code, why would you even need CD's? You have the record for when you want to play music at home, and you have the digital download for your laptop and your iPod. It seriously is the best of both worlds. And as a few others have said, the hunt for something that's collectible is pretty cool too. I feel like the casual music listener doesn't really care... but when you buy a record, you're actually investing in the music. I don't know if that makes sense, but that's how I feel anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If something is recorded in analog (tape) the sound is more "captured".

There are subtleties to the sound that you can and cannot hear, but when recorded analog it is there.

Analog sources can then be transferred to digital, but the sound (frequency, bit rate, tone and other factors) are compressed to a medium that does not have the infinite range of sounds that tape (DAT or regular) or vinyl do.

So when you record to analog and physically imprint that sound to the medium it remains.

If you compress to digital you get what fits into that medium's range (16 bit 44.1 khz for cd, 24 bit 96 khz for DVD.)

That being said there are plenty of recordings (a lot of stuff recorded in the 90s and 2000s) that are recorded digitally, so often it may as well be a cd since that audio when put on vinyl would have no better audio quality.

You can record digitally in a bit and frequency higher than will fit on a cd (which could then be on DVD audio or HDCD) but would still not sound as good as an analog source on analog format.

That's why when CDs first came out (some still hae it) you'd see three letter mastering descriptions in the booklet or the back of the case using all As and Ds.

This is a SPARS code.

The A is analog and the D is digital.

It tells you in order what the source was, what the mixing format was and what the mastering format was.

So a cd from a 70s album would probably be AAD or ADD depending on if it was mixed using analog or digital media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist