Tom Delonge's UFO

6 hours ago, Shitty Rambo said:

 

Quit trying to misrepresent my counterpoint or act like those examples are wildly irrelevant.. How about if this isn't a slam dunk decimation of the Trump presidency you donate that $25 to a charity of my choosing and if it is I'll do the same?

Those are wildly irrelevant. I'm talking about a President accusing his predecessor of personally ordering wiretaps of a candidate. You brought up a bunch of other shit. 

I don't think we're going to agree here. I'm out.

15 minutes ago, Shitty Rambo said:

Nope. Don't want anything from anybody I don't earn myself

 

The fact that your don't hold the state accountable for prior major fuck ups is very off-putting. You're acting as if the US hasn't killed people are invaded other countries on a whim (remember all those WMDs in the middle east? How about Obama bombing weddings based on meta data?) 

 

Let's see how this NSA stuff unfolds, chances are it will fall short like every other attempt to discredit Donald Trump. Maybe your guy's wish will come true and the state will murder another person you don't like.

If you noticed I was trying to stay on topic and never mentioned opinions on what prior things the US has done. Don't pretend to know someone's opinions just because they don't agree with a line of logic you hold true.

I tried.

35 minutes ago, Shitty Rambo said:

I don't know what Vox is nor do I care what they have to say on the matter. If you're going to label Napolitano as someone without credibility (when he's the only Fox News staff member who's anti-war and anti-authoritarian police state mind you) then it's clear you have a very loose grasp on your argument.

 

Like a collective that uses force to seize private property and throw people in cages for voluntarily putting drugs into their own bodies suddenly has high moral principles, and would never ever spy on a loose cannon buffoon who actively talks against them/was on the brink of inheriting all the power Bush and Obama granted themselves during their terms in office.

If he's going to make those claims he needs to provide evidence, he has not. He was suspended by Fox (seems to me that Fox doesn't even find their own commentator totally credible), came back on and double downed on his claims, while still not providing any evidence. 

Your arguments about one governmental action equating to another I find highly flawed at a baseline level. I don't see any room for a rational conversation, if any argument is met with, "well the government does X, so you're wrong."

Wanna put a wager on this?  If it is found that Obama personally requested a wiretap of Trump, I'll buy you a record of your choice - up to a $25 value shipped?

5 hours ago, Shitty Rambo said:

Obama may have dropped 26,171 bombs in 2016, but surely he draws the line at wiretapping an anti-establishment anti-media sociopath, right?

 

I don't put anything passed the state, and don't have any reason to belive Judge Napolitano would suddenly start making shit up just for the sake of it.

 

Trump probably was spyed upon, Russia was probably heavily involved with WikiLeaks, and JFK was probably killed by the CIA.¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

No one with any credibility has come forth saying there's any evidence that happened. 

http://www.vox.com/world/2017/3/30/15126072/devin-nunes-source-white-house

"On March 4, Trump alleged — without providing any evidence — that Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign. “Shortly thereafter,” the Times reporters write, “Cohen-Watnick began reviewing highly classified reports detailing the intercepted communications of foreign officials.”

The clear implication of this Times claim is that Cohen-Watnick was looking for anything that could vindicate Trump’s wiretap claim.

About a week later, new National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster tried to get rid of Cohen-Watnick, whom the CIA reportedly didn’t trust because it saw him as hostile to them as an institution. On March 10, McMaster informed Cohen-Watnick that he would be moved to a different position in the NSC. On March 12, Trump personally intervened (reportedly at Bannon and Kushner’s prompting), overruling McMaster and keeping Cohen-Watnick in place.

Sometime during all of this, Cohen-Watnick found the intelligence intercepts that mention Trump officials. What happened between that unspecified date and the night of March 21 isn’t exactly clear. Ellis, the White House lawyer who used to work for Nunes, somehow got looped in and wound up briefing Nunes when the lawmaker got to the White House grounds."

25 minutes ago, WAXXX said:

 

    and    

1 hour ago, WAXXX said:

you don't see how the government surveilling everyone is relevant to the surveillance of a president-elect?

11 minutes ago, WAXXX said:

your mom certainly fails.

 

i'll rephrase: there's no such thing as incidental surveillance when it's known that literally everyone is under targeted surveillance.

Jesus, still missing the point. Our government was surveilling Russians when Trump associates were making contact with them. 

The point is we possibly have compromised individuals at the highest level of government running things - this should be alarming to anyone regardless of political ideologies. 

If you want to be concerned and have a conversation about government surveillance, fine, but I don't think that applies to this thread and how it's specifically about Trump.

7 minutes ago, WAXXX said:

i'm saying that everyone is surveilled all the time. "incidental" merely provides cover for the government to not outright admit that they are spying on the entire world. this goes way beyond trump. i fail to see how "incidental" spying is any different than targeted spying. 

You certainly do fail. 

How can you not see the difference between a President accusing his predecessor of illegally wiretapping him, and the larger surveillance program that is known?  You're being intentionally obfuscating. 

Is anyone else kind of underwhelmed by this? Only listened through once, but first impressions is I like Joy, Departed way better.

I didn't see this anywhere and am curious as to what people think.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/865809794/wheel-by-miniot

It seems pretty intriguing, but too rich for my blood.

48 minutes ago, WAXXX said:

Congratulations on self identifying as a fucking asshole.

3 hours ago, Shitty Rambo said:

I like my buddy Daniel's opinion on the matter...

 

"Honestly,  some say this is censorship, but this is just the other side of the coin that is the relationship that the press has with the White House administration. When Obama was in office they traded admiration and praise for access, secret intelligence sources, and overall whitewashing through the guise of information.  While during the campaign they traded access for praise of hillary and demonization of Trump.  Now they're dealing with the demon, it's not about censorship or morality, but revenge.  While yes, having inconsistent standards for different outlets is unfair, when has the state ever been fair about anything? Now the press knows how the public should feel."

The Obama administration also had struggles with the press. The idea that "they traded admiration and praise for access, secret intelligence sources, and overall whitewashing" has no grounding in reality. Maybe you can point me elsewhere, but I haven't seen anything.

From the New Yorker article:

"The Obama White House has hardly been immune to complaints about access and its treatment of the press. The last eight years have been marked by an escalating cat-and-mouse game between a communications staff that has constantly sought new ways to directly communicate with the public and a corps of White House reporters who see the efforts as a manipulative attempt to limit their access. Obama’s early use of Twitter and Facebook to make news was seen as controversial, as was the White House’s use of its own videographer to record the President in settings to which the press had no access. The White House’s production of “West Wing Week,” an in-house “news” show with a Pravda feel, was mocked by reporters. And Obama’s use of non-traditional venues for major interviews—“The Tonight Show,” “The Daily Show,” “Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown,” “Running Wild with Bear Grylls,” and ESPN—often frustrated reporters."

Edit: tense of word

3 hours ago, ninjplaysdrums said:

Dryjacket - For Posterity

 

atozmedia.com/soundcard

 

9P8REPT52E

 

my favorite release so far this year. 

Really underrated album. 

Impeach Trump petition:

https://impeachdonaldtrumpnow.org

While the Trump administration have already done enough disturbing things. What concerns me the most is how they consistently attack facts and straight up lie. That is a cornerstone of fascism, not to mention most other things he's doing. 

I don't want to be an alarmist, but these things generally only lead down dark roads. 

Definite AOTY contender 

27 minutes ago, Tommy said:

I felt the same way about Obama when BLM and The Police were beefing it out over the summer, but that never happened

Obama did renounce the violence:

" First of all, any, any violence directed at police officers is a reprehensible crime and needs to be prosecuted. But even rhetorically, if we paint police in broad brush without recognizing that the vast majority of police officers are doing a really good job, and are trying to protect people and do so fairly and without racial bias, if the rhetoric does not recognize that, then we’re going to lose allies in the reform cause.  "

14 minutes ago, ExtraFox said:

From Cameron Crowe's page:

 

http://www.theuncool.com/2017/01/26/singles-deluxe-soundtrack/

 

Curious; is there anyone else who likes the soundtrack who's never seen the film? I was the perfect age for grunge but have never had the urge to see this.

Yep, I was about 13 or 14 when this came out. Loved the soundtrack, but never saw the movie, always wanted to though.

Converge thread on VC fails me.

Signed and regular Emotion Side B are up again if you missed out - 

http://www.carlyraejepsenshop.com/

Kind of surprised I couldn't find a thread for this. This album is really good.

http://dryjacket.merchnow.com/

5 hours ago, cbrownfx said:

Found the highly sensitive Hillary supporter.   Poor little snowflake.