chariskaps Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 All it takes is a single person with a tape measure and some records to take a moment and end this madness. Really though, picking a fight with someone who is asking for a simple measurement... what is wrong with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chariskaps Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 No. You still want to know the depth of a stack of records. I don't think you're an actual carpenter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timsimmons Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 It's 14"Take care TheWindBlower 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
̮ ɤ ̮ Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Err, yeah, I could find out the dimensions for an ikea product but that's not what I'm looking for. Do try to find something better to do with your time. I can't check right now, but I think I have around 40 records in each shelving unit. But I also leave some extra space to make it easier to sort and shelve new records. So it gives you at least a hint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fowty Dollaz Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Is it this? Or This? How about this? How do they intend to store the records? When you say stack of 50 records I think of the top picture ThatLoveSound, No This Is Patrick and mac1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+hecollec+or Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 thefinalmasquerade 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chariskaps Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 No. You still want to know the depth of a stack of records. I don't think you're an actual carpenter. Why would you suppose any of us know this off the top of our heads? We are not carpenters, nor do we collect records to stack them 50 high to measure them This is why your question is not being taken seriously. Another reason, as I and others have shown, is that this information can be easily found with the tiniest bit of research, which as the person responsible for creating this storage, we'd think you'd be interested in putting the effort forth to find. Rather than wasting YOUR time making annoying comments at those of us here to not discuss carpentry, why don't you go to a record store or goodwill store or pound some keyboard keys and find your own answer? You are off your head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futures Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Seriously. Records are 7", 10", or 12" wide. He wants a depth/thickness measurement... You'd think a carpenter would know the difference. I want to know the width of a stack of 50 records. A 'stack of 50 records' is a different thing to 'a record'. Do try to keep up sweetie. No. You still want to know the depth of a stack of records. I don't think you're an actual carpenter. oh my god all of this hahahaha ThatLoveSound 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilmuse Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 IKEA Kallax Expedit Bookcase Shelving White Storage. IKEA Kallax Bookcase Shelving White Storage New Design Replaces Expedit. Product dimensions. Depth: 15 3/8 " Width: 16 1/2 " Height:57 7/8 " Max load/shelf: 29 lb. Billich0986, mssskat184, throwgncpr and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilmuse Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Good luck making your custom square. Hairy Potter, emacs and mac1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chariskaps Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 It's 14" Take care I can't check right now, but I think I have around 40 records in each shelving unit. But I also leave some extra space to make it easier to sort and shelve new records. So it gives you at least a hint. Thanks guys, much appreciated You see kids, it's not so hard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryantark Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 We wanna see this beauty when complete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack8urt0n Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 37 throwgncpr and chariskaps 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slinch Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 I'm expecting a wooden version of this also relevant: Your getting really pissed about stuff that doesn't really effect u or do u any harm threshold is staggeringly low! MCDELTAT, chariskaps and mac1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chariskaps Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 37 Cheers Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilmuse Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 The hell? So this isn't even a new subject? Hah. Hey, I'm going to be honest and admit that I'm being kind of an asshole. However comma is it really that difficult to find existing dimensions of decent record storage on the net? Are you going to construct this cube to hold 50 records exactly? I'm confused why someone who appears to want accuracy is turning to anyone but himself to get an answer. Suppose I should thank you though for giving me something to do Monday morning. ExtraFox 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouTwo Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 I don't understand this thread. A stack of 50 gatefold sleeves is going to be very different from a stack of single sleeves. Maybe the client could measure his stack of 50 records. What happens when they buy a new record? I think this thread is a riddle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundofsilver Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Thanks guys, much appreciated You see kids, it's not so hard! Not as fucking hard as using the internet to find the dimensions? If you were a carpenter, you wouldn't have asked us. Bitch about others trolling you? You caused it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGhostOfRandySavage Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Changing something's orientation in space does not change which dimension is its depth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slinch Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 I want to know the width of a stack of 50 records. A 'stack of 50 records' is a different thing to 'a record'. Do try to keep up sweetie. Sorry sir for all the frustration this thread has caused. I have taken the time to do some solid calculations, and used your helpful graph as well: After intense pondering I have come to the conclusion that a stack of 50 records is the same width as a single record. Proof: I am sorry the rest of the board wasn't as willing to help. I hope you find this information useful. Next! ̮ ɤ ̮, chuck, poweredbytrust and 6 others 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouTwo Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Changing something's orientation in space does not change which dimension is its depth... But he's the professional and we're just the dummies on the vinyl forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chariskaps Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 Not as fucking hard as using the internet to find the dimensions? If you were a carpenter, you wouldn't have asked us. Bitch about others trolling you? You caused it. Hahahahahahhahahahaha. I can't get my head round the vitriol of people like you. I know I can find the dimensions of a record - I wanted an idea of how much space they take up when they are on a shelf, in their sleeves, which isn't actually something that's easily findable online. I suppose I'd need to know the width of the individual record + the width of the card sleeve ( x2) + the width of the paper insert ( x2) + the average distance that is between records once they've been around a while and so aren't in perfect nick. Regardless of all the pointless and pathetic unpleasantness, I still got an answer I couldn't realistically have found elsewhere,thanks to a couple of folks on here. As fun as this has been, I'll be off now I have the simple answer I came for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliminator Jr. Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 It's threads like these I learn to love again. futures 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouTwo Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 It's threads like these I learn to love again. This thread just made my Monday morning a little more tolerable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chariskaps Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 Eugh, you guys are actually gross. I wonder if you're as unpleasant in real life. Anyway, I'll merrily be on my way, and you, bless your souls, can fuck right off! Cheerio darlings! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts