Jump to content

There Will Be Hell Toupée! (The Donald Trump Thread)


Recommended Posts

It's crazy how many folks have completely forgot all the Tea Party protests after Obama was elected.  Both sides protest.  Both sides have idiots that say over the top things.  Like when Obama was elected some guy kept going on the news saying he wasn't even an American and that he was a secret muslim?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stl_ben said:

It's crazy how many folks have completely forgot all the Tea Party protests after Obama was elected.  Both sides protest.  Both sides have idiots that say over the top things.  Like when Obama was elected some guy kept going on the news saying he wasn't even an American and that he was a secret muslim?!

My dad made the news? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, WAXXX said:

just because you hate something, doesn't make it white supremacy.

 

anyone attacking bannon should put forth a legitimate argument. all i see are knee-jerk opinions.

Stop reading blogs and start reading news? There is plenty of legitimate criticism of Bannon. It isn't hard to find.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/12/2016 at 9:35 AM, mac1 said:

 

Stupid box

24 minutes ago, stl_ben said:

It's crazy how many folks have completely forgot all the Tea Party protests after Obama was elected.  Both sides protest.  Both sides have idiots that say over the top things.  Like when Obama was elected some guy kept going on the news saying he wasn't even an American and that he was a secret muslim?!

Dude, please. The tea party protests did not loot and burn down cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BuzzersonKillwell said:

Correct. It is a statement. The choice to stay uninformed is yours.

you represent a growing faction within the regressive left that seem unable to construct a contradicting argument. if you have a case to make against bannon then make it. it's sad that the best you can do is direct me to mainstream propaganda to listen to other people's opinions on your behalf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be very hard to make a case on anything that isn't aligned with the alt-right movement's worldview if any information from mainstream propaganda is suppressed/dismissed and "mainstream propaganda" is defined as literally anything that disagrees with the alt-right movement's worldview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thefavoriteplay said:

Let me clarify, burning things: cars. Which will get worse (like buildings) if nobody wrangles in the protesters. 

  Just an  example of vandalism, which did not happen with the tea party. 

There was vandalism in Tea Party protests too, for example there was a Democrat office in New York that had bricks thrown through it's windows.

I'm not advocating violence or vandalism, but to say it's one sided is stupid.  People on both sides of spectrum do dumb stuff, that doesn't make all of them dumb.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WAXXX said:

you represent a growing faction within the regressive left that seem unable to construct a contradicting argument. if you have a case to make against bannon then make it. it's sad that the best you can do is direct me to mainstream propaganda to listen to other people's opinions on your behalf.

 

bartolo-colon-swing-and-miss-against-pir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WAXXX said:

you represent a growing faction within the regressive left that seem unable to construct a contradicting argument. if you have a case to make against bannon then make it. it's sad that the best you can do is direct me to mainstream propaganda to listen to other people's opinions on your behalf.

It goes both ways though, where's your argument showing how he isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burden of Proof

Sources

You guys are just going to go round and round.

You'll site a source saying he is, then the other side will say well that site doesn't count as a real source.

The other person will show a source saying he isn't  and the other side will say that source doesn't count either.

On and on and on and on.

Ain't no logical nothing going tix this flumox .

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9 minutes ago, stl_ben said:

Burden of Proof

Sources

You guys are just going to go round and round.

You'll site a source saying he is, then the other side will say well that site doesn't count as a real source.

The other person will show a source saying he isn't  and the other side will say that source doesn't count either.

On and on and on and on.

Ain't no logical nothing going tix this flumox .

 

 

 

The only site* I source is the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

 

*knee-mail

Edited by abovetheearth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist