stl_ben Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Also people are getting paid to be attacked? Who is paying the attackers? Or are they attacking people of their own free will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAXXX Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 hour ago, stl_ben said: Also people are getting paid to be attacked? Who is paying the attackers? Or are they attacking people of their own free will. you didn't watch the video. people are being paid to instigate violence at trump events, even if this means getting attacked, as that creates a more negative portrayal of donald trump in the media. who's paying them? straight from scott foval's mouth: "the campaign (hillary clinton) pays DNC (democratic national committee), DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, the Foval Group goes and executes that shit on the ground." Tommy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stl_ben Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 durp Instigating getting attacked. Is that like wearing "slutty" clothes and asking to get raped? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFP Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 minute ago, stl_ben said: durp Instigating getting attacked. Is that like wearing "slutty" clothes and asking to get raped? The video stated that people instigating and responding violently are both paid actors. At least that was said about the Scott Walker incident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAXXX Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 57 minutes ago, stl_ben said: Instigating getting attacked. Is that like wearing "slutty" clothes and asking to get raped? no. it's like having a political party pay people to incite violence at their opponent's event. not only is this ethically corrupt, it's downright illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexH. Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 That video was also produced by a guy who has repeatedly been busted for playing detective and massaging video footage into something it's not. Just about every single fucking video he has ever produced has been revealed to be fraudulent in some way. I don't have the time or intestinal fortitude to watch a 16 minute conspiracy video, but the guy does not have a great track record. stl_ben and nancy_raygun 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipyourbartender Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16557 http://www.catholicsinalliance.org/ A catholic spring? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuzzersonKillwell Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 This is what 99.9% of all corporate e-mails chains are like, at least in marketing and strategy. Unformed ideas are given topical monikers to get quick alignment and buy-in. They would have almost certainly gone with different external messaging but called the activation "Catholic Spring" internally. It's utterly unremarkable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGhostOfRandySavage Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 9 hours ago, BuzzersonKillwell said: This is what 99.9% of all corporate e-mails chains are like, at least in marketing and strategy. Unformed ideas are given topical monikers to get quick alignment and buy-in. They would have almost certainly gone with different external messaging but called the activation "Catholic Spring" internally. It's utterly unremarkable. I think the concentration should be more on the fact that they're essentially talking about overthrowing and changing catholic doctrine. People in government should not be thinking about this in general. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 9 hours ago, BuzzersonKillwell said: This is what 99.9% of all corporate e-mails chains are like, at least in marketing and strategy. Unformed ideas are given topical monikers to get quick alignment and buy-in. They would have almost certainly gone with different external messaging but called the activation "Catholic Spring" internally. It's utterly unremarkable. reminded me of a cute read https://www.amazon.com/Novel-Matt-Beaumont/dp/0452281881 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas³ Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 14 minutes ago, The Ghost of Randy Savage said: I think the concentration should be more on the fact that they're essentially talking about overthrowing and changing catholic doctrine. People in government should not be thinking about this in general. Hey, England did it once. They seem to be okay. /s stl_ben 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipyourbartender Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 9 hours ago, BuzzersonKillwell said: This is what 99.9% of all corporate e-mails chains are like, at least in marketing and strategy. Unformed ideas are given topical monikers to get quick alignment and buy-in. They would have almost certainly gone with different external messaging but called the activation "Catholic Spring" internally. It's utterly unremarkable. Wow. They are a political party running for president of the united states, not a corporation strategizing about some bullshit . They are talking about eliminating a part of the catholic church because they don't align with their views. You don't have to be religious to see how fucked up that is. It doesn't matter if they are talking about catholics, jews, muslims or mormons. This is America and the government does not get to decide how and why someone practices their faith. WAXXX and Tommy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipyourbartender Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 (edited) Trump now calling for Congressional term limits and closing lobbyist loopholes. That's a great idea that most people support, but no lifetime politician would ever suggest. One candidate running on ending government corruption, and one is the embodiment of government corruption. Edited October 19, 2016 by tipyourbartender Tommy and WAXXX 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipyourbartender Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Also, my family runs a business and we are incorporated. We've got about 10 employees in our office and about 70 spread throughout the country. We don't talk anything like this in emails, over the phone, or in meetings. We talk like normal people. I guess we are that 0.1%? Seriously, if our business was to get a 15% tax rate like Trump is proposing, we would be able to hire a new engineer which we need, pay some employees more, and have cash to invest. WAXXX 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Politicians running for office have a main duty to pump sunshine up our asses with every lie to get them a lifetime chess game of a job with our lives. Congress is the alarm clock at 6 in the morning when you laid down to go to sleep at 4. doesnt matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 9 minutes ago, tipyourbartender said: Seriously, if our business was to get a 15% tax rate like Trump is proposing, we would be able to hire a new engineer which we need, pay some employees more, and have cash to invest. Hell yes. MAKE AMERICA WORK AGAIN WAXXX 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas³ Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 54 minutes ago, tipyourbartender said: Wow. They are a political party running for president of the united states, not a corporation strategizing about some bullshit . They are talking about eliminating a part of the catholic church because they don't align with their views. You don't have to be religious to see how fucked up that is. It doesn't matter if they are talking about catholics, jews, muslims or mormons. This is America and the government does not get to decide how and why someone practices their faith. Welcome to the baby boomers running our country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAXXX Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 19 hours ago, AlexH. said: That video was also produced by a guy who has repeatedly been busted for playing detective and massaging video footage into something it's not. Just about every single fucking video he has ever produced has been revealed to be fraudulent in some way. I don't have the time or intestinal fortitude to watch a 16 minute conspiracy video, but the guy does not have a great track record. ad ho·mi·nem ˌad ˈhämənəm/ adverb & adjective 1. (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining. "vicious ad hominem attacks" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexH. Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 "Everything this guy has made is fake and on occasion has hilariously blown up in his face" is sort of an ad hominem, I guess, but I stand by it. stl_ben 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerseydave77 Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I'll take the new Michael Moore doc on Donald Trump instead. At least I can laugh while thinking of all the delusional people that believe a man who has jumped is own manufacturing around the globe so he only has to pay workers 33cents an hour because the $1.30 in Honduras was too much will somehow grow a fucking pair and worry about them achieving the middle class American Dream instead of how he can make a few more pennies. OCTOBER SURPRISE!!!!! http://www.indiewire.com/2016/10/michael-moore-in-trump-land-donald-ifc-center-1201737657/ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stl_ben Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Evidently I am not able to Like posts by Thomas3? Not sure why, but here is +1 imaginary likes to your post above about England. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 i can see that you liked it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stl_ben Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Cool Cool, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuzzersonKillwell Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Getting political information from James O'Keefe is like getting scientific information from antivaxxmom.blogspot.com. stl_ben 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexH. Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 23 minutes ago, BuzzersonKillwell said: Getting political information from James O'Keefe is like getting scientific information from antivaxxmom.blogspot.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.