Jump to content

PO SOON: Pelican - Nighttime Stories (6/7/2019)


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Derek™ said:

Earlier Pelican doesn’t sound like this at all, to me.  My problem with a lot of Pelican’s prior albums is that there’s too much fluff.  There are well-constructed, killer riffs and Russian Circles-tier chugs here and there... but they’re flashes in the pan on albums like Fire In Our Throats.  There’s just too much wandering and not enough purpose.  I think the songwriting is absolutely tightened up this time around.  If anything, a lot of the songs - this time around - take some time to breathe, slow down, and not pummel the listener with monotonous riffs.  I don’t know, I can’t find a weak song on the entire thing.  Even the chiller intro and interlude are great breathers that help retain the flow of the record and keep it from ever getting to be overbearing.  I think each song unpacks at a similar pace, and in a similar fashion than Russian Circles — never in my life would I imagine their songwriting to be on an equal footing but here we are.

Admittedly I don’t know if I ever made it through a full Pelican album prior to this one.  Any time I tried in the past I would get so bored I had to move on.  Felt the same way when I saw part of their set at Dunk USA & also when I listened to their live Dunk album.  This new one absolutely caught my attention way more than anything I’ve previously tried to listen to.  Like I said the way some of these tracks end is what’s doing it for me.  I look forward to more listens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrewest said:

Admittedly I don’t know if I ever made it through a full Pelican album prior to this one.  Any time I tried in the past I would get so bored I had to move on.  Felt the same way when I saw part of their set at Dunk USA & also when I listened to their live Dunk album.  This new one absolutely caught my attention way more than anything I’ve previously tried to listen to.  Like I said the way some of these tracks end is what’s doing it for me.  I look forward to more listens.

There are a handful of Pelican albums that I have to mentally prepare myself to sit down and listen to start to finish, so I get it.  I’ve only caught them live once but I thought they were pretty killer.  I suspect a big culprit could be their drumming – it’s nowhere near the level of variety and interest that Dave contributes to RC.

 

Let me know if it grows on you at all.  If not, at least we have LITE and Blood Year in a couple of months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't sound like Pelican till track 6

Last song was probably my favorite, but overall, it sounds like  an instrumental verison 70's rock/metal, Sabbath-lite, which I already lived through and spent enough money on. Not a bad listen though.

If anyone wants a red copy to flip, one of Derek's recommendations earlier in the thread still has one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, throwgncpr said:

I don't know how someone can listen to the first 5 tracks and not think it sounds like Pelican..

I think it sounds like a version of Pelican that have clear intent and direction with their songwriting, and know how to weave memorable riffs into their music.  Midnight and Mescaline feels like an exercise in taking the best bits of their last album and morphing it into an entire track.  It's a new Pelican for me and I'm into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a clear continuation of where they were heading with Forever Becoming. It's better and more focused, but this is by no means a stretch for them.

 

I'd put this up with my favorite Pelican releases (I actually prefer the slow, wandering fluff of their earliest songs). This might even be their best, were it not for Abyssal Plane.  That song really bugs me and it pulls me out of the joy of the rest of the album. The lead guitar riff is annoying, and Larry's drumming on this song is not working at all for me. Still, it's one low point on an otherwise really great record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Derek™ said:

I think that’s what makes this album so good.

That it doesn't sound like former (meh) Pelican -- jajaja -- I couldn't resist, from my truncated quote. J/K my brutha! I know musical tastes are subjective and glad you are enjoying 70's rock. This could have been the album between Rush ST and Fly By Night, almost ;)

But seriously, if this album was released by a lesser known or unknown band and was a Gumbo bandcamp rec on the Postrock thread , would  you be loving it and clamoring for vinyl, or is it because of the fact that it is ....Pelican?

I'm already two posts too many into this thread,  so I will leave the final word to Derek (I've listened to every Pelican album and revisited at various stages through the past 10 years or so, and like @mrewest who has yet to see the pg.lost light, fail to own any of their music on vinyl)

Only 3 pages on a new Pelican release, too, seems odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, drds89 said:

That it doesn't sound like former (meh) Pelican -- jajaja -- I couldn't resist, from my truncated quote.

Yeah, that's exactly it, actually.  I am by no means a Pelican fanboy.  I own their stuff and I enjoy it but more often than not I have to be in a pretty specific mood to fully appreciate one of their albums, start to finish.  Just my personal 2¢ but I don't find their "full album" songwriting abilities to be as well-rounded or as engaging as a band like Russian Circles.  I think I'm going to have to take your word on that Rush comparison, though.  Admittedly, I am not well-versed in the realm of classic rock... but from your post I'm gathering that Rush was either grimy, riff-heavy post-metal earlier in their career, or that you've gotten a hold of a Pelican prog-rock record.  Really struggling to wrap my head around either scenario and would enjoy your elaboration unless you're truly done with the thread.  I see no harm in keeping it afloat with new posts – I doubt anyone is expecting any sort of specific updates or links at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, I appreciate your irenic spirit of discussion! I'd think few would disagree earlier Pelican is in the metal genre, most likely post metal.

I like quite a few post metal bands, but they  never clicked with me.

This album sounds like rock until the later tracks, where we get some metal riffage and some dynamics to earn the monicker of "post."

Re: Rush, it's always been difficult for me to call S/T a prog rock album.  When Neil joined the band and started writing lyrics, they started moving away from your typical rock band.

Even CoS, Fly By Night & 2112 are rock albums to  me, but the thematic approach and longer tracks  started getting the attention of prog fans, I'll give them the nod.

They were a rock band who could write radio friendly beauties, but also Xanadu, Cygnus X-1 and side 1 of Hemispheres to make them a prog rock fan's dream.  They could be accessible to wider audience of top 40 folks. Then came Moving Pictures...you know the story. It was fun living through that era. Yes, King Crimson, Tull, Led Zep and Pink Floyd's albums sound so different when you're in middle school vs college -- as did side 1 of Hemispheres lol.

I don't think I can put into words like the mighty Gumbo how hard rock differs from metal. The ends of the spectrum are easier to get consensus, but the continuum where hard rock and light metal differ is mushy.

The discussion can go like those genre-related discussions within the post rock universe, that includes such divergent sounds as Mogwai, Sigur Ros, Explosions, Godspeed, Mono, etc -- don't you love it when reviewers who listen to an album that is supposed to be "post rock" and then say fans of EiTS and Godspeed should love this?! smh

Again, to my ears, this album (first 5 tracks) sounds lighter than earlier Pelican and agree with you a logical progression from Forever Becoming.  It's instrumental  rock (that's been done before, but not boring or bad, technically.  I guess I need to re-listen for that drum miscue mentioned by another member) -- and some metal later on. Gain some fans, lose some.

Russian Circles isn't always full-on post metal (I know you never said or implied it), they have written some really nice, lighter post rock tracks, some very beautiful ballads, etc. But most of us would call them post metal without blinking an eye, or adding the extra stuff I just did ^^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2019 at 7:38 PM, kisol said:

Don’t tell their bass player

 

 

LOL, bubblegutz was probably reefed as usual. Most of the big name post rock bands eschew the moniker for some reason, but shorthands or labels or genres as a starting point of identification for discussion. Not sure why they do, especially Mogwai. "Mostly-instrumental-rock-metal-band-with-loud-soft-loud-dynamics-atypical-song-structure-if-vocals-likely-used-as-another-instrument-sometimes-with-samples-and-longer-than-3-minutes-duration"

I've already written my opinion about Brian elsewhere.

And to think shoegaze used to be a derogatory term! :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist