Jump to content

Fire insurance claim for my vinyl


Recommended Posts

Hi I'm completely new so apologies for any mistakes. Has anyone any experience of pricing their vinyl for an insurance claim. We had an extensive collection of 400 vinyl albums also cds and. Cassettes The insurance have asked us to price them on a new for old basis. We thought 10 pounds per album was fair as they were in excellent condition, ages ranging from late 60s to present.    Does that sou d fair. Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steve 57 said:

Hi I'm completely new so apologies for any mistakes. Has anyone any experience of pricing their vinyl for an insurance claim. We had an extensive collection of 400 vinyl albums also cds and. Cassettes The insurance have asked us to price them on a new for old basis. We thought 10 pounds per album was fair as they were in excellent condition, ages ranging from late 60s to present.    Does that sou d fair. Thanks. 

You can catalog everything to the best of your memory using Discogs.com, that will give you a low/medium/high estimate of your collection. I’ve got ~370 records and my collection on average is worth about 10,000 USD ($27 per record) according to discogs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Tommy said:

You can catalog everything to the best of your memory using Discogs.com, that will give you a low/medium/high estimate of your collection. I’ve got ~370 records and my collection on average is worth about 10,000 USD ($27 per record) according to discogs

With that in mind, do you have insurance on them?  Faced 2 California wildfires yesterday last year that hit way too close to home.  Thinking it’s time to finally insure my collection since it’s getting “up there”.

Edited by Derek™
Tried to talk and type at the same time. Whoops.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, shenanigans said:

Catalog them on discogs. I added some renters insurance for mine. Discogs says average value is ~$30K and the insurance company has a link to my discogs on file.

we had it added to our homeowners insurance and they also asked for the link after I explained what discogs was. They also asked for photos of my collection as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dusted_By_Space said:

we had it added to our homeowners insurance and they also asked for the link after I explained what discogs was. They also asked for photos of my collection as well.

Yeah, I originally just had a deadformat, but they asked for something indicating values so I moved everything into discogs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have any home or renters insurance you can usually add them as a separate rider. Just explain it to your insurance rep and they’ll get you what you need and tell you what will work - Discogs is the de facto nowadays, I believe. 

 

Unless you have a massive collection this is probably the easier, simplest and cheapest way to insure them.

 

Works for anything collectible: comic books, bird calls, lunchboxes, Happy Meal toys, etc. 

 

EDIT: Misread that you already went through insurance and you’re only looking to calculate the value. As mentioned, Discogs is the way to go since it does the legwork for you once you input your collection. 

Edited by unknown pleasures
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As previous posters have suggested, discogs would be place to go as figures are based on actual sales and the median figure would probably be accurate, plus it's extensive and everything you had would as likely be there, however it sounds unfortunately as if having lost the items you have no way of knowing what they all were apart from memory. Unless anything was sufficiently salvageable to enable identification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lugubrious said:

So the insurance company bases the pricing of the collection based on what the items are selling for on Discogs, as opposed to what the original purchase price was?

This is correct.  Because the $20 record you bought in 2001 may be worth a lot more now than it was 18 years ago, due to rarity or aftermarket values over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck this makes me want to catalog my record collection. I have a fairly large collection with a ton of valuables and I’d hate for it to go to shit in a fire. I’m so lazy I barely got around to alphabetizing the collection though... then again that might make this whole process easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lugubrious said:

So the insurance company bases the pricing of the collection based on what the items are selling for on Discogs, as opposed to what the original purchase price was?

Of course, the point is to be able to replace your collection. If your $15 record from 2005 burned to a crisp and you were given $15 compensation for its destruction, and the thing sells for $230 now, how would you get it back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad, the OP did actually say the insurance company had asked for them to be priced on a new for old basis.

Quote

The new for old basis of settlement is now the standard basis for settling home insurance claims. This basis provides for the property that is damaged to be replaced as new with no deduction for wear and tear

As pounds were also mentioned I am guessing OP may be from the UK, so I'm not sure if it is be different in the US. Unfortunately it still leaves the apparent  problem of having no exact record of the items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EGsynergy said:

Fuck this makes me want to catalog my record collection. I have a fairly large collection with a ton of valuables and I’d hate for it to go to shit in a fire. I’m so lazy I barely got around to alphabetizing the collection though... then again that might make this whole process easier.

I was intimidated when I finally decided to catalog the collection, but the barcode scanner in the discogs app expedited the process. It wasn't perfect, but it definitely helped

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kcblackrob said:

I was intimidated when I finally decided to catalog the collection, but the barcode scanner in the discogs app expedited the process. It wasn't perfect, but it definitely helped

I will say that the app does help some, but moreso if there aren't a ton of variants and pressings.  For stuff with a ton of pressings I found it a lot easier to just catalog it the usual way.  Still need to get the rest of mine on there, probably have 80% or so of it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, aopps42 said:

I will say that the app does help some, but moreso if there aren't a ton of variants and pressings.  For stuff with a ton of pressings I found it a lot easier to just catalog it the usual way.  Still need to get the rest of mine on there, probably have 80% or so of it done.

100% agree - I have some No Idea releases that I had to straight-up guess at which pressing it was. y'know 'raspberry grey mud' isn't always listed. (not picking on them, but they always seem to be one of the harder to decipher for me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Steve 57 said:

Hi I'm completely new so apologies for any mistakes. Has anyone any experience of pricing their vinyl for an insurance claim. We had an extensive collection of 400 vinyl albums also cds and. Cassettes The insurance have asked us to price them on a new for old basis. We thought 10 pounds per album was fair as they were in excellent condition, ages ranging from late 60s to present.    Does that sou d fair. Thanks. 

I got a quote for mine. I used the the numbers on Discogs. I pay about $20 extra month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EGsynergy said:

Fuck this makes me want to catalog my record collection. I have a fairly large collection with a ton of valuables and I’d hate for it to go to shit in a fire. I’m so lazy I barely got around to alphabetizing the collection though... then again that might make this whole process easier.

Once you start you may realize its actually pretty fun and you'll find yourself revisiting some old records you haven't spun in years. Once you got em all in its pretty easy to keep on top of each time you buy a new record

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tommy said:

Once you start you may realize its actually pretty fun and you'll find yourself revisiting some old records you haven't spun in years. Once you got em all in its pretty easy to keep on top of each time you buy a new record

Not only this but it’s incredibly satisfying to have a collection that is 100% relevant to your current tastes, or as close to 100% as possible.  At least for me, anyway.  There’s stuff I pre-ordered over the years that just didn’t live up to the replayability I was hoping for, or artists I sort of “outgrow” as time goes on.  It’s really nice to throw those out for sale and free up shelf space while simultaneously funding new purchases... and that’s all way easier to manage with a catalog that you update frequently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert here, but this is something I've been meaning to do for a few years now. 

 

The only thing you should probably check with your agent is if your coverage is for replacement value vs. market value.

 

I have plenty of pricey test pressings and OG 1st pressings of stuff. I'm not 100% sure how this applies to this sort of item, but I would want to know if I made a claim, would I be paid on the market value on what I lost and not the value of a recent reissue as a replacement copy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing to remember when estimating the value is you're not going to get it down to the exact dollar or cent. Even if you did, it would be different tomorrow or next week or next year. You just need a close enough approximation to give the insurer an idea of replacement cost.

 

And you better believe regardless of how much or how little work you put into your estimate, if the time comes when you need to file a claim they'll be going over the figures themselves in great detail, especially if you're claiming the collection is worth a significant amount of money.

 

As someone said earlier, photographic evidence is a must, the more detailed the better.

Edited by unknown pleasures
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist