Jump to content

Bierbelly

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by Bierbelly

  1. Nope. Besides shenanigans (who can be more of an expert on this subject), as an expert on this topic, you are wrong.

    Correct, nothing fixes worn grooves.

    Incorrect, cleaning is not overrated. Pressing plates have anti-fungals sprayed on them, which can then be transferred to the record. All new records should be cleaned.

    Incorrect, Dawn is not as good as anything. It contains a multitude of different chemicals that do not need to be on your stylus.

    TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Cleaning records isn't for your record's health, its for the health of your stylus.

    I've given this some more thought, and some internet research, FWIW. No doubt thar new discs could have remenants of the release compounds that are used in pressings, but since these are usually silicone oils, they might actually be more beneficial to leave on the surfaces in the long run. Very slippery and therefore provide lubricant to the grooves. Very unreactive, so wont hurt any of the components of the stylus either.

    Antimicrobials? What kind? They'd need to be pretty reactive to affect any of the diamond, cantilever arm (aluminum, or even more exotic/less reactive) or the glue, where present, which holds them together. From what I can tell, the glues are proprietary, so its difficult to assess their chemical resistance, but its likely pretty high.

  2. Why is that so hard to believe?

    Discogs is your friend. How many do you have

    Well over 300.  Just poured over them the other night trying to match records with sleeves.  Most sleeves are generic though.  It's mostly C&W, like 50s to late 60s.  A few Elvis, Ray Charles...you get the idea.  Old juke stuff.

  3. Nope. Besides shenanigans (who can be more of an expert on this subject), as an expert on this topic, you are wrong.

     

    Correct, nothing fixes worn grooves.

     

    Incorrect, cleaning is not overrated. Pressing plates have anti-fungals sprayed on them, which can then be transferred to the record. All new records should be cleaned.

     

    Incorrect, Dawn is not as good as anything. It contains a multitude of different chemicals that do not need to be on your stylus.

     

    TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Cleaning records isn't for your record's health, its for the health of your stylus.

    Dawn plus rinse with distilled...all gone.  BTW, if I'm not mistaken, the stylus is made of diamond...pretty tough and unreactive.  

     

    I know, I know, record collectors/audiophiles need their comfort zones.  How many stylii has anyone actually worn out?

  4. no dont throw them away! discogs is a decent place to gauge value of records. popsike too

    Could spend 2-3x on shipping. Besides, its clear that demographics are against me. Who is interested in old music...except those older than me?

    Crap, they're all in homes by now...well, not the Springsteen fans...though they should be

  5. OK, fair enough.  Did a little research, and it's not worth that much.  I wasn't aware that 45s were still being released as late as '84, so I thought this must be a promotional copy or a juke copy.  Probably worth more than a buck, though.

     

    There are a lot of Springsteen junkies, though, you know.

  6. Late 50s thru early 70s mostly. Lots of C&W, lots of junk, some gems. 8-10 Elvis, 4 Elvis pic jackets...havent found the matching disks yet. Ray Charles, Johnny Cash, Bobby Vinton...you get the idea. 300+ disks, good to fair shape. B sides pristine!

    I'm in Northern Virginia...too heavy to ship...if youve got an old juke, these would fill in you empties.

    $100 takes them all.

    Bier

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist