Jump to content

So Glad I moved out of NJ after college


Recommended Posts

http://www.1010wins.com/Court:-Bars-Liable-for-Drivers-Who-Drank-Elsewhere/1861934

Court: Taverns Liable for Drivers Who Drank Elsewhere

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) -- Bartenders can be responsible for drunken drivers who visited their establishment, but did not have any alcohol there, a state appellate court ruled Thursday, in a decision that lawyers said expands the duties of tavern operators.

In a unanimous decision, the three-judge panel found that the estate of a man killed when his drunk friend drove off the Garden State Parkway can sue the Cape May bar they visited before the accident.

The driver, Frederick Nesbitt III, was 19 at the time and wasn't served alcohol at the bar, but had been drinking beforehand with the friend, James A. Hamby, 21.

Both were rowdy before leaving the C View Inn the evening of Sept. 3, 2003, their friends testified, although not all agreed that both were drunk.

At the time, Hamby's license was suspended for a drunken driving conviction. He bought a 12-pack or 18-pack of beer, as well as a pint of rum, and the pair began drinking in Nesbitt's car, and later with friends, before getting to the C View Inn for their regular Wednesday ``Wing Night'' gathering.

A server recalled bringing the five-person group three or four pitchers of light beer, but said she knew Nesbitt from high school and that he was underage, so only brought him soda.

Nesbitt, however, testified at his deposition that Hamby twice spiked Cokes ordered by Nesbitt by placing the glass beneath the table.

After the crash, Nesbitt's blood alcohol level was found to be .199, about twice the legal limit.

The court also determined that ``if employees of the Inn recognized or should have recognized Hamby's intoxication as the result of the visible manifestations of his condition that we have described, the Inn had a duty to protect him from foreseeable injury as the result of an automobile accident by insuring that he did not drive and that he did not ride as a passenger with a patron who was similarly impaired.''

The ruling reverses a trial judge who dismissed the lawsuit and sends the case back for trial. The appellate panel said a jury should determine whether the C View Inn has any liability in Hamby's death.

Nesbitt was also sued and settled through his insurance carrier for about $50,000, said the lawyer for Hamby's estate, R.C. Westmoreland. Nesbitt pleaded guilty to vehicular homicide and began serving a five-year prison term in 2004.

Westmoreland applauded the ruling, calling it a ``great breakthrough.''

``A bar that is expert in spotting intoxication, and has patrons that are drunk as skunks, it just can't let them get on the road and kill someone,'' he said. ``They now have an obligation, when they see obvious intoxication, to do something.''

The lawyer for the C View Inn, Terence M. King, disagreed with the ruling, but also viewed it as an expansion of the state's so-called Dram Shop Act. He said no decision has been made on whether to appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court.

Sorry to all my friends still stuck in that god forsaken state.. this is a bullshit law

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist