Jump to content

throwgncpr

Members
  • Posts

    2,530
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by throwgncpr

  1. I think what is creating a difference in perception is the difference in the source material. WATT was beautifully recorded and mastered, and sounds quite nice on CD. I think that expectations were high for a vinyl edition. Without remastering it for vinyl, there is not going to be much gain for people, and if there is any amount of surface noise, it will probably be perceived poorly

    ACBtLD on the other hand, sounds like crap on CD. It's terribly mixed, and suffers badly from clipping. A vinyl release of this, even if not remastered may sound slightly warmer and better to a lot of listeners, given there isn't a ton of surface noise.

    It's not really a fair comparison.

  2. Really? I thought It was fantastic. Really cool to hear the older tunes in a new light.

    yeah, I hated the mixes. I'll stick with the original copies. I did like what they did on Prototypes and Painkillers though.

    These Fat box sets seem weird to me though. First 3 albums, first 4 albums, first 7 albums. Seems arbitrary. Though for Lagwagon it worked for me because those were the albums I actually listen to regularly.

  3. I was going to pick those up also, but I have placed like three orders over the past few days and payed shipping for each one.

    have they shipped yet? might be worth shooting him an email to see if he can add onto a previous order. might be able to save on the shipping. though I imagine he's inundated with messages right now.

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist