Liimpan Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I'm pretty sure he was joking / being ironic, but I could be wrong. A good portion of his vinyl collection is post-2000, so I just assumed he was trolling. Oh alright. Sorry! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8ight Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Definitely, 100%, with not even a millisecond of hesitation: no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacredheart Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Obviously it is a case by case issue, but that would mean Metallica never sucked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexH. Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I'm pretty sure he was joking / being ironic, but I could be wrong. A good portion of his vinyl collection is post-2000, so I just assumed he was trolling. Actually, about half of my collection is pre-2000, it's just mostly stuff that was pressed in the millions/worth 2-10 dollars, so I've never bothered inputting it into my tradelist. I'm working on a wicked Kate Bush picture sleeve single collection. Thinking about this now with my music in front of me, I can pretty safely say no, but i do think discographic entropy is more of a factor now than it was 20/30/50 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raidenradio Posted May 30, 2014 Author Share Posted May 30, 2014 It's usually the first 3 starting with the one you heard first. When a band wants your attention it's great. When they have your attention it's pretty good. When they want your attention back it sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.