Jump to content

Iggy_Pilot

Members
  • Posts

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by Iggy_Pilot

  1. 13 hours ago, MacDonals said:

    Hopefully it's a better pressing than the RSD release. I have a copy and it sounds like shit. Like they took the CD files and popped it onto a vinyl.

    Are you talking about the U.S. or E.U. pressing?

    I am pretty sure they are going to use the plates from one of these two pressings for the Newbury variant. I guess it will be the U.S. plates.

  2. On 5/4/2021 at 10:33 PM, truexbeliever said:

    Coretex has an aqua / 325 and an indie edition electric blue. I think that brings the total up to ten different versions 🥴

     

    https://coretexrecords.com/Descendents-9th-Walnut-PRE-ORDER_9

    To avoid further confusion: it is not /325 but it is "375". "375 Media" is a big distributor and they started some time ago (this year? did not notice it earlier) distributing exclusive variants. It does not represent the pressing number of their variants, afaik.

    https://375media.com/

     

  3. 33 minutes ago, IanRees said:

    I'm not really sure who they use in EU, I do have a guess though, but we use Pirates Press / GZ and have had very little delays this year if not very fast turnarounds for most releases.

    The Mariachi El Bronx - Musica Muerta release was manufactured by PP/GZ that's why I assume they are using them again for this. Though I wish they would not. I missed the PO unfortunately but if I ever get a copy, I would prefer not to have that notorious GZ in-house cut. These just do not sound good.

  4. 1 hour ago, mcpherson123 said:

    I hear you but its getting more and more rare for albums to have been recorded in analog anyway and a vinyl record really is the best logical progression of a final product for music that was recorded in the analog domain. Its just a shame to mix in a ton of non-analog sourced vinyl records with a pressing that is all analog. It shouldn't be even considered as "niche within niche." It should just be the logical course of action to keep an all analog recording in the analog domain by skipping digital conversion for vinyl production regardless of how much easier it makes reproduction. If you make a digital transfer as a safety I get that. In case anything happens to permanently damage the original tapes you have something to work with but that, in my opinion, should be a last resort. I would argue it doesn't make it that much less complicated if you're already going through all the steps to manufacture vinyl in the first place. That's why there are audio engineering  professionals and those who know how to cut a stereo master tape to lacquer.

    I think this is a very idealistic but also naive and simple view of things. Going full analog is not simple. Maybe you should (re)read articles and interviews Shields gave on the process when they released it in 2018 initially.

    Please remember Loveless did not even exist in it's completeness on analogue tape before. A tape had to be created for the 2018 reissues. That is a safety copy of course. Not the original master tape was used for it because of all the splicing. 

    Labels will not do the complicated out of house cutting every time to keep titles in production. It is basically the reason why first pressings are of higher value than reissues. It's always been like that.

    Anyway, I own the 2018 AAA as well as an OG 1991 pressing. I like the OG better. That's why I am curious what the new digital one will sound like because the OG one was not AAA of course.

  5. 3 hours ago, mcpherson123 said:

    If you had a AAA final retail version of your record on vinyl, why would you press only a partition of your manufactured stock that way and then do a separate master including digital conversion?

     

    Who would ever do this and why?

    One set of lacquers can be used to create metal parts for pressing up to 100,000 copies, probably less. After that a new set of lacquers is required which gets plated. Cutting new sets of AAA lacquers using the tape which was  created for this purpose is a lot more complex than cutting from digital files.

  6. 17 hours ago, Derek™ said:

    Memes aside, what are your guys' honest guesses on what the announcement could be?

    I predict either a bump or increase in boxsets, to make them more widely available – they never stated the 5,000 was a one-time run – or they announce that "due to overwhelming popularity", they're going to release each album individually.  As if that wasn't a part of the plan all along.

     

    17 hours ago, Your Ex-Wife said:

    I'm hoping it's the first one but it's gotta be one of 'em.

    Unfortunately none of it.

     

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CMUZwOyq17H/

     

  7. 7 minutes ago, Portsi said:

    Sure! Here are the infos for Oceanic, Panopticon and Truth:

     

    Oceanic: 69227 CORE058-ROBO074

    Panopticon: 69228 CORE058-ROBO074

    Truth: 69229 CORE058 ROBO074

     

    Rest of the records are like that too.

     

    Thanks this is interesting to know! Discogs does not have the matrix for the boxset listed.

    Obviously different stampers (and probably a different cut) than the later repressing which all have a PIRATES PRESS and GZ Media matrix. Does not mean the remastered digital files for cutting were different though.

     

  8. 25 minutes ago, Portsi said:

    Nice! How do you like the boxset (Shades of the swarm)? I also got it couple months ago and have mixed feelings. The new cover sleeves are so small that it's impossible to put the records inside them. Also the generic white sandpaper inner sleeves were a bit dissappointing.

     

    As for the sound quality, the heavy 180g vinyl sound dead quiet with no surface noise. I'm just a stupid casual listener but to my ear the sound feels a bit compressed. My Panopticon remaster sounds more dynamic. But overal all albums are very enjoyable to listen. The box and new cover arts are very beautiful.

     

    Great that Panopticon is finally getting this repress. Hopefully they press it enough... It's ridiculous how hard Panopticon and Oceanic are to find these days.

    The boxset was released in 2008 originally. It was cut from the remastered files by James Plotkin. I think these remasters were also used for later pressings - unless Plotkin did another, different remastering job for the later pressings?

    You might want to compare the matrix info of your standalone copy of Panopticon to the one from the boxset if it is different. Or give the matrix info of the boxset disc here for comparison.

    Would be interesting to know if the boxset had different stampers. Let us know, please :)

  9. Package was  in my city already but returned by DHL suddenly. According to DHL some information was missing on the delivery address/shipping label. Although I gave that when I ordered and is stated on the order confirmation, too.

    Red Creek was supportive and informed me they are going to resend it when it has been returned to them.

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist