Jump to content

$40k fine & felony for media to approach oil spill


Recommended Posts

While I find the story hard to believe, my role in coastal restoration of southern Louisiana can attest to the annoyance of getting my work done due to media companies reserving every...single...available hotel/motel/rental down near Venice.

It's really frustrating when I try to get a crew down there and am unable to get a hotel room because it's been practically bought out. The worst part--nobody's even in the rooms!

I recently had a subcontractor tell me that she has been in every part of the world and has never paid such an exorbitant amount of money for a place to stay.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/lagohsep/ there are plenty of pictures being taken, by the way.

huh, imagine that. the media getting in the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Can't see the forest for the trees?

I don't want to debate how far away the press should stand any longer. Look at the bigger issue. The further undermining and stripping of personal, basic rights is the outrage we're upset about. This is no longer just an issue of BP trying to cover their asses and play PR games. The government is now involved, by enacting a law, to restrict the free press. Where else can/will this be applied? It's already illegal in 3+ states to film police officers, citing "obstruction of government operations". Net neutrality could possibly give the government, ISPs, and special interest groups complete control over the content available to the public over the internet. The government is, in theory, supposed to work FOR us. Transparency is the best way to keep that luxury in check. Further, this is yet more proof of corporate hold and influence on law-making decisions. Calling this a "democracy" or "democratic republic" is laughable at best when coporations - not even US-based ones in this example - can influence actual action and results in their favor. Why would you ever defend said behavior?

I don't want to fight over where the line should be drawn regarding how far away the press should stand from oil spill crews or damage. If it were my job to cover the oil spill I certainly would not want to be in the way of progress. But progress isn't being made nor is it being attempted and that's what needs to be said. What I'm upset over is the stripping of the right to be able to show the lack of dedication and responsibility, the lobbying, and the wrong business decisions that lead us to where we are today. I'm upset at the willingness to violate basic rights in order to preserve an image of a corporation. Hell, just the willingness to violate basic rights. It's not about 65 or 300 feet. It's about greed, deceit, and unconstitutional decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See? An agreement can be made. An understand of the vitality of either sides roles. - http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/07/breaking-news-update-due-to-popular.html

Now if only they'd scale up the effort on this mess. We have thousands upon thousands of unemployed people in this country. If only they could create a public works effort to get things moving, clean up the spill, and give some people some work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share




×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist