swemoll Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 This thread. This forum. This life. This hobby! Alice in Chains and anthemforadoomed 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaizada Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 OP, I'm not sure why you decided to keep spinning your records on the LP60, but that machine will most probably damage your vinyl. Problem is that it does NOT have adjustable VTF. You might track too heavy or too light, both which damage records. Save the vinyl IMHO, till you get something slightly better. Just my 0.0000000002 cents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajxd Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Shaizada- I'd pay at least 0.0000005 cents for your opinion. Alice in Chains 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcguirk Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 The point I always repeat: you won't notice if your records are being damaged while using a cheap player. The player isn't capable of attenuating the full complexity and depth of the record. You'll only notice damage when you swap to a significantly more expensive table/cartridge and you have problems like constant sibilance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaizada Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Shaizada- I'd pay at least 0.0000005 cents for your opinion. Thanks for the high evaluation...looks like I'm going to make it to the big times finally! Got more opinions from where that one came! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomhead Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 The player isn't capable of attenuating the full complexity and depth of the record. Huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcguirk Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 It's a roundabout way of saying that a Crosley Cruiser just isn't engineered to read the full amount of data stored on a vinyl record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kannibal Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 Attenuate is NOT the right word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allenh Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 Were you trying to say The player isn't capable of accessing the full complexity and depth of the record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomhead Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 Were you trying to say The player isn't capable of accessing the full complexity and depth of the record. I dunno, maybe he's got a different perspective here? Maybe with his taste in music he appreciates equipment that attenuates? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcguirk Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 I dunno, maybe he's got a different perspective here? Maybe with his taste in music he appreciates equipment that attenuates? I was a little drunk, so sue me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allenh Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 I was a little drunk, so sue me. That does attenuate the music, there is a mathematical law for the phenomenon where required volume closely follows alcohol intake. At least it does in my house. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.