Jump to content

Vinyl vs lacquer


Recommended Posts

So I just got a bootleg 7", limited to 50 copies according to the sleeve. But I doubt they would press such low numbers. Also the disc itself feels a bit weird almost like it is a piece of plexi glass instead of vinyl. Could it be a lacquer instead of vinyl? Is there a way yo easily identify the difference between vinyl and lacquer?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I assume you're thinking of is a lathe, not a lacquer. Lacquers are generally the first step in the process of pressing vinyl unless the DMM (direct metal processing) process is used. Stampers are then made from the lacquer, and from there the vinyl is pressed. 

 

Lathe records are pieces of polycarbonate plastic, which have grooves hand cut into them by hand on a lathe machine, much like a lacquer. Unlike a lacquer though, a lathe is meant for listening to, while a lacquer is just a step in the vinyl manufacturing process. 

 

What you have sounds like a lathe, but you would have to post a picture for someone to answer for sure. A regular 7" record and a lathe cut record generally look very different though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not likely a lacquer. Generally, there is only one lacquer (or acetate, or master) disc per pressing of a record. The master is used to make stampers (reverse impressions of the master) which are in turn used to press the vinyl, so a lacquer technically could be played on a turntable - and they were in the past. It might even be the best way to listen to a vinyl pressing since it would be the least adulterated medium. 

 

That being said, lacquers are made the same way that lathe-cut records are. So, given that someone had enough material to make a run of fifty records on a lathe, they very well could be cut on something other than vinyl. Maybe even plexiglass. It probably isn't an actual lacquer, though, since that material is much more expensive than vinyl. 

 

Post some pictures if you would, it sounds cool!

 

Edit: Damn it rfc, you beat me to the punch!

 

Edit 2: I should clarify that aluminum (what many lacquer discs are made of) is not necessarily more expensive in bulk than vinyl, but it'd certainly be more expensive to produce lacquer discs than records - because they must be electroplated with the lacquer, which is an expensive process. The only feasible way for someone to do a run of 50 lacquer records would be if they were an employee of a mastering company and were able to do it under-the-table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist