¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 wait, did Jagr just go to Vancouver too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 No but Dallas is gonna move him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanchardoswald Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Jagr to Boston is done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 man tomorrow is gonna be boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanchardoswald Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 man tomorrow is gonna be boring. I was going to skip class, but is it even worth it? Geez. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The only guys left who are sure to be moved are kipprusof, ppmmenville & ribero. Will be interesting to see if van actually moves Luongo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyFuckingPowers Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Wonder if theyll save any trades for tomorrow....I know Clowe will be one. Theres teams interested in Brian Boyle. PLEASE FUCKING TAKE HIM! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyFuckingPowers Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The only guys left who are sure to be moved are kipprusof, ppmmenville & ribero. Will be interesting to see if van actually moves Luongo Honestly, idk why NJ doesnt trade for him. They really could use him. They dont really have a goaltender capable of taking the lead after Broduer leaves. I expect them to trade for a goalie either the next day or 2, or the summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanchardoswald Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Honestly, idk why NJ doesnt trade for him. They really could use him. They dont really have a goaltender capable of taking the lead after Broduer leaves. I expect them to trade for a goalie either the next day or 2, or the summer. Clarkson for Luongo. Boom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyFuckingPowers Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Rangers apparently very interested in Curtis Glencross. He only costs 2.5 million. I would take him in a heartbeat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
companyinkrecs Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Honestly, idk why NJ doesnt trade for him. They really could use him. They dont really have a goaltender capable of taking the lead after Broduer leaves. I expect them to trade for a goalie either the next day or 2, or the summer. Just when I thought you were at the absolute edge of ridiculousness, you come up with this gem. Bravo Matt. Eklund has nothing on you. The Devils have two goalies under contract for next season. They didn't do that for fun, they did that because they've accepted the fact that those goalies need to carry the load for at least one more season beyond this one (and because neither knew if there would even be a season this year). The team has 2 1/2 solid goaltending prospects right now in Wedgewood, Kincaid, and Clermont. The odds are in the favor of Scott Wedgewood being the heir apparent to Brodeur, for better or for worse: http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/scott_wedgewood/ WHY they would take Luongo's massive contract with its length and cap hit is beyond even a reasonable hypothesis. But with that logic Matt, I'm surprised you aren't Sather's assistant! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanchardoswald Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Just when I thought you were at the absolute edge of ridiculousness, you come up with this gem. Bravo Matt. Eklund has nothing on you. The Devils have two goalies under contract for next season. They didn't do that for fun, they did that because they've accepted the fact that those goalies need to carry the load for at least one more season beyond this one (and because neither knew if there would even be a season this year). The team has 2 1/2 solid goaltending prospects right now in Wedgewood, Kincaid, and Clermont. The odds are in the favor of Scott Wedgewood being the heir apparent to Brodeur, for better or for worse: http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/scott_wedgewood/ WHY they would take Luongo's massive contract with its length and cap hit is beyond even a reasonable hypothesis. But with that logic Matt, I'm surprised you aren't Sather's assistant! Shut up! As a Canucks fan, let me dream! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 theres rumors flying of a "prolific high scoring forward" being traded by tomorrows deadline and my co-worker is convinced its Ovechkin to the West. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanchardoswald Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 theres rumors flying of a "prolific high scoring forward" being traded by tomorrows deadline and my co-worker is convinced its Ovechkin to the West. No way in hell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Honestly, idk why NJ doesnt trade for him. They really could use him. They dont really have a goaltender capable of taking the lead after Broduer leaves. I expect them to trade for a goalie either the next day or 2, or the summer. I think NJ has their eyes on Bernier in the off season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 theres rumors flying of a "prolific high scoring forward" being traded by tomorrows deadline and my co-worker is convinced its Ovechkin to the West. is this rumor from Eklund/Hockey Buzz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Just when I thought you were at the absolute edge of ridiculousness, you come up with this gem. Bravo Matt. Eklund has nothing on you. The Devils have two goalies under contract for next season. They didn't do that for fun, they did that because they've accepted the fact that those goalies need to carry the load for at least one more season beyond this one (and because neither knew if there would even be a season this year). The team has 2 1/2 solid goaltending prospects right now in Wedgewood, Kincaid, and Clermont. The odds are in the favor of Scott Wedgewood being the heir apparent to Brodeur, for better or for worse: http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/scott_wedgewood/ WHY they would take Luongo's massive contract with its length and cap hit is beyond even a reasonable hypothesis. But with that logic Matt, I'm surprised you aren't Sather's assistant! Telling yah man, Bernier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 is this rumor from Eklund/Hockey Buzz? e2 no, i have no idea where he's hearing the rumors, on twitter or something, and I dont really follow many nhl analyst people on there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
companyinkrecs Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Telling yah man, Bernier. That's slightly more reasonable than thinking Luongo goes to NJ, but I still think the Devils hold off to see how the prospects develop. There is no urgency for a goalie, this team can't score goals. Shut up! As a Canucks fan, let me dream! You'll still get rid of him somehow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 e2 no, i have no idea where he's hearing the rumors, on twitter or something, and I dont really follow many nhl analyst people on there. thats the only place ive seen that rumor, if you want here is a list i made on twitter that has a lot of good hockey analyst (of course there is the occasional rumor mongerer for funsies as well) https://twitter.com/ianrees/hockey oh yeah, Van re-signs Higgens to a 4 year extension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The Backhand Shelf trade deadline drinking game http://blogs.thescore.com/nhl/2013/04/02/trade-deadline-drinking-game-the-leap-from-hypothetical-to-reality/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Kings traded Drewiske to MTL for a 5th Hes a pretty solid d-man, got stuck being a 7th D here because of depth. Will do well as a 5-6 if he gets the ice time in MTL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Rangers apparently very interested in Curtis Glencross. He only costs 2.5 million. I would take him in a heartbeat. Sounds like Clowe will be a Ranger soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanRees Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Clowe to NYR - a 2nd, 3rd & a conditional 2nd if he re-signs, done deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyFuckingPowers Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Just when I thought you were at the absolute edge of ridiculousness, you come up with this gem. Bravo Matt. Eklund has nothing on you. The Devils have two goalies under contract for next season. They didn't do that for fun, they did that because they've accepted the fact that those goalies need to carry the load for at least one more season beyond this one (and because neither knew if there would even be a season this year). The team has 2 1/2 solid goaltending prospects right now in Wedgewood, Kincaid, and Clermont. The odds are in the favor of Scott Wedgewood being the heir apparent to Brodeur, for better or for worse: http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/scott_wedgewood/ WHY they would take Luongo's massive contract with its length and cap hit is beyond even a reasonable hypothesis. But with that logic Matt, I'm surprised you aren't Sather's assistant! Because why not? Yeah he has a huge contract, but you're getting a good goaltender for that price. A guy who could help win more games than Broduer and Moose right now. Yeah they have 2 goalies on contract, so does Vancouver, doesnt mean both of them are going to stay there man. Even Dregger was talking about NJ trying to trade for a goalie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.