harryq

Nothing in John Podesta's emails is bigger than the Tom DeLonge emails about UFOs.  That is a fact that cannot be disputed.

Nothing in John Podesta's emails is bigger than the Tom DeLonge emails about UFOs.  That is a fact that cannot be disputed.

Nothing in John Podesta's emails is bigger than the Tom DeLonge emails about UFOs.  That is a fact that cannot be disputed.

Nothing in John Podesta's emails is bigger than the Tom DeLonge emails about UFOs.  That is a fact that cannot be disputed.

part of me wants to buy all 4, thinking that I could always resell them later and turn a profit, but the other part of me realizes that I never sell anything and probably don't need 4 copies of this album on my shelf.
 
decisions, decisions...

Honest, non-confrontational, not intentionally judgmental question: Let's say the two potential (non-Trump) outcomes are:
Hillary wins with 45% of the vote; Trump gets 40% and other people get the remaining 15%. Hillary wins with 60% of the vote; Trump gets 40% and no one else gets ~any of the vote. Which of these outcomes do you think is more likely to lead to a viable third party?  My belief is that if Hillary absolutely crushes Trump, it would be so embarrassing that the RNC could split between the crazy people (e.g., the people who continue to oppose LGBT-rights) and the sane people (e.g., fiscal conservatives with social beliefs from the 21st century), and then you'd have your viable third party.
I would also argue that if you want a legit 3+ party system (or at least a better system), the better strategy would be to start at the local level rather than at the Presidential level.  For instance, I'd rather protest-vote and let someone like Trump become a state/US Senator or Representative than protest-vote and have Trump be President.

Is enabling and covering up sexual assault less horrific than committing rape and sexual assault?  Yes.  Was that a serious question?
 
As for taking funds:
What are Hillary and the Clinton Foundation doing with said money? Who has Trump accepted money from over the course of his business career, and what has he done with that money?  Does Trump outsource the production of Trump ties, etc. to countries with great human rights records?  Does the Trump Foundation have a good reputation?  How about Trump University? I don't see this argument working in your favor...

Honest, non-confrontational, not intentionally judgmental question: Let's say the two potential (non-Trump) outcomes are:
Hillary wins with 45% of the vote; Trump gets 40% and other people get the remaining 15%. Hillary wins with 60% of the vote; Trump gets 40% and no one else gets ~any of the vote. Which of these outcomes do you think is more likely to lead to a viable third party?  My belief is that if Hillary absolutely crushes Trump, it would be so embarrassing that the RNC could split between the crazy people (e.g., the people who continue to oppose LGBT-rights) and the sane people (e.g., fiscal conservatives with social beliefs from the 21st century), and then you'd have your viable third party.
I would also argue that if you want a legit 3+ party system (or at least a better system), the better strategy would be to start at the local level rather than at the Presidential level.  For instance, I'd rather protest-vote and let someone like Trump become a state/US Senator or Representative than protest-vote and have Trump be President.

You do know that Ivana Trump (wife #1) accused Donald of raping her, right?  And that many other women have accused him of assaulting them, right?  Then there's also his admission to going into the Miss Universe dressing room to "inspect" while the women were getting dressed, but I think you get my point.
Anyhoo, I'm not saying Hillary is an angel or that she has never said/done anything bad to the women Bill has been accused of doing things with, but to equate what Hillary has done regarding "women's rights" to Trump's history of (accusations of) rape/assault and admissions of generally creepy/sleazy behavior seems like a bit of a stretch.

Despite having been a Hillary supporter throughout this campaign, I'm now convinced that Trump is going to grab this election by the pussy.

I'd totally donate to Hillary again if I could get a "monster card" to go with my woman card

You're pro-Assad?  I mean, I guess he can't be that bad if he got 88.7% of the vote in 2014... And heck, if he keeps bombing, killing, and torturing the people who don't support him, I'm sure he'll get an even bigger % of the votes next time!
 
So yeah, nevermind, you're right.  Let's leave Syria alone and not admit any refugees into the country.  Seems like the right move.
 
Almost forgot: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain

Maybe so, but what should the US do with countries like Syria?  Support Assad?  Fight Assad?  Ignore Assad?
 
What should the US do with the people suffering in Syria?  Give them a safe place to come to?  Let them die?  Say "well they elected Assad with 88% of the vote so they must like him" and not question if their elections are ~legit?
 
I understand you're not cool with having a vagina in the white house, but other than that, I'm not sure what you want.

Maybe so, but what should the US do with countries like Syria?  Support Assad?  Fight Assad?  Ignore Assad?
 
What should the US do with the people suffering in Syria?  Give them a safe place to come to?  Let them die?  Say "well they elected Assad with 88% of the vote so they must like him" and not question if their elections are ~legit?
 
I understand you're not cool with having a vagina in the white house, but other than that, I'm not sure what you want.

You're pro-Assad?  I mean, I guess he can't be that bad if he got 88.7% of the vote in 2014... And heck, if he keeps bombing, killing, and torturing the people who don't support him, I'm sure he'll get an even bigger % of the votes next time!
 
So yeah, nevermind, you're right.  Let's leave Syria alone and not admit any refugees into the country.  Seems like the right move.
 
Almost forgot: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain

You're pro-Assad?  I mean, I guess he can't be that bad if he got 88.7% of the vote in 2014... And heck, if he keeps bombing, killing, and torturing the people who don't support him, I'm sure he'll get an even bigger % of the votes next time!
 
So yeah, nevermind, you're right.  Let's leave Syria alone and not admit any refugees into the country.  Seems like the right move.
 
Almost forgot: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain

You're pro-Assad?  I mean, I guess he can't be that bad if he got 88.7% of the vote in 2014... And heck, if he keeps bombing, killing, and torturing the people who don't support him, I'm sure he'll get an even bigger % of the votes next time!
 
So yeah, nevermind, you're right.  Let's leave Syria alone and not admit any refugees into the country.  Seems like the right move.
 
Almost forgot: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain

Trump thinks that kid is a terrorist, right?  Just checking...

Trump thinks that kid is a terrorist, right?  Just checking...

Agreed.  Those insults don't quite have the same staying power of "Crooked Hillary", "Crazy Bernie", "Lyin' Ted", "Little Marco", "Low-Energy Jeb", and "Pocahontas"

You're right, I can't think of any Islamic-inspired terrorist attacks before 2008...

You're right, I can't think of any Islamic-inspired terrorist attacks before 2008...

You're right, I can't think of any Islamic-inspired terrorist attacks before 2008...

I think I'm okay with it if the candidate is not a member of the party.  if they were biased against martin o'malley, that would seem worse to me than having a bias against a guy who (literally?) hasn't paid his dues to the party.

#MakeMemesGreatAgain