Jump to content

Brand New - Your Favorite Weapon


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why does this come up so often? Who cares what they do. They paid for the license, they can do what they want. Obviously it's pretty exploitive of them to do, but there is nothing anyone can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does this come up so often? Who cares what they do. They paid for the license, they can do what they want. Obviously it's pretty exploitive of them to do, but there is nothing anyone can do.

I've been told that a lot of licensing agreements dictate an exact number to be pressed for example 1,000. If they were to repress it they may have to get a new/updated licensing agreement. So they could be doing something very wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does this come up so often? Who cares what they do. They paid for the license, they can do what they want. Obviously it's pretty exploitive of them to do, but there is nothing anyone can do.

I've been told that a lot of licensing agreements dictate an exact number to be pressed for example 1,000. If they were to repress it they may have to get a new/updated licensing agreement. So they could be doing something very wrong.

We have no proof this is a repess, or if they ever exceeded their allowed number (if there ever was one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow that's shitty

Unregulated free market capitalism in most cases is pretty shitty. It is a crying shame that a label would charge $150 for this record. If they were half-decent people they would sell these for a reasonable amount say even $25 but that is not the case unfortunately. I will wait till one day when there is a repress, until then I will take my $150 dollars somewhere else. Some place where I can get say like 10 records or so for $150 instead of one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they actually pressed more than 1000 originally but kept them aside as they only were licensed to press 1000. I don't think it's likely they secretly repressed this as I'm sure someone would find out by now or have looked into it. Seems like it'd be easier to hide an original overrun than an entire press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share




×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist