Jump to content

ZeroNowhere

Members
  • Posts

    1,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14
  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by ZeroNowhere

  1. 10 hours ago, twatay said:

    You ever seen them live? Listen to their records? Somehow I’m able to separate art from the artist. Weird stuff, I know.

    I have 5 of their records and have seen them live a few times years ago.  After having kids it made me realize I'm not interested in supporting someone like that.  Weird stuff, I know.  Good for you if you are.  They need every fan they can get. 

  2. Got the Dr. Dre today.  Shipped Fed Ex so it comes quickly but is in a regular record mailer with no padding.  Nice top seam split because they left the records in the sleeve.  The sleeve was one of their selling points…..so that’s cool.  Asking if they can send a replacement sleeve but not holding my breath.  Sleeve is single pocket, for the money and 2 lp it should have been gatefold.  The insert picture of Dre is super low quality.  Haven’t listened to it yet but am already on the fence moving forward.

  3. 16 hours ago, achillesstand7 said:

    I’d say that I like it overall, but there are a few misses on it for me. I haven’t really been able to get into the talk-singing that John does on Beneath the Rose and Choir. I like other bands that sing like that but so far it hasn’t clicked for me when he does it. Then there are a couple of the mellower songs that seem more like interludes than actual songs, so it makes it feel like there are only 4 or 5 actual songs on the album. It makes it feel kind of short. But, it’s growing on me. 

    I like this record and haven't really cared for much of their output since the Blue record.  Side 2 has a weird silent (very quiet) transition, but other than that, I find it to be a really enjoyable album.  The talk-singing didn't feel as awkward on the 2nd spin fwiw.  To your point, it does feel really short.  

  4. 1 hour ago, TheGhostOfRandySavage said:

    Yeah, that's why I said "under vg" and not "vg and under." I agree with you.

     

    Edit: vg often doesn't meet my personal standards though. It's gonna vary person to person.

    Agreed.  I found some awesome records at a flea this weekend but most were visually VG so I passed.  That said, one record looked great but plays G+.  It must have groove damage that I can't see from heat because it's still jacked after cleaning.  The other 5 I bought from same collection based on persons name on the jackets were great.  Records............but here I am complaining about a Europe record sounding like shit.  I need help.

  5. 33 minutes ago, TheGhostOfRandySavage said:

    Fair is typically slightly better than poor, but not quite "good." G+ is the same between good and vg. Often times people grade something a little low so that they don't get someone saying they over-rated, so you may get a vg that was graded g+ so as to not oversell it.

     

    No one really buys anything below vg+ (media) anyway unless it's incredibly rare and sought after. Under VG is straight garbage, and vg is often pretty bad.

     

    It's pretty intuitive if you think about it at all and speak English.

    VG shouldn't be garbage if it's graded correctly, but also skirts a fine line of G(+) depending on the grader.  Once you get to that grading, visual doesn't cut it any more and it needs to be listened to which is obviously time consuming if you're selling in volume.  It's a slippery slope.  I try to be ultra conservative, don't have time to play grade, and probably pitch records that sound better than they look at times but that's life.

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist