Jump to content

TheGhostOfRandySavage

Members
  • Posts

    19,702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    138
  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by TheGhostOfRandySavage

  1. 1 hour ago, Fowty Dollaz said:

    I also think that OP had a genuine question and came to the right place to learn a little, not just collect data. Welcome new folks!

    I'm with you. This one felt sincere to me (and it looks like most folks here) so they didn't get the snark brigade.

     

    Plus a bunch of people learned that you can search matrices on discogs, and I'm glad they did. It's the only way I search when I'm adding stuff now, especially older stuff.

  2. 1 hour ago, Derek™ said:

    Not to hijack OP’s thread, but.

    I get that people chase first presses, so I’m not trying to rain on any parades with this post.  But for those that do, I’ve never really understood why they do… unless that OG copy happens to sound the best or has some unique packaging / art / content that doesn’t make it onto future presses.

    Maybe it’s just me but being able to say “yeah I own a 1st press” has never been a massive flex in my books.  I guess it’s nice when it happens but for releases that are just standard black vinyl and basic packaging, printed again and again over the years, I feel no additional satisfaction knowing that I bought a record 10 years before someone else bought an exact copy at their local shop for $22 or whatever.

    In fact, I’ve often sold OG presses for a really nice profit, and then turned around to buy an expanded edition, or repress with better sound quality, or a cool variant.  So long as the sound quality is the same or better, I’ve personally thought of that as a win… but to each his own.

    I have at least 1 friend who is always on the hunt for OG presses, even if they sound inferior or are scuffed to hell and back from being handled for the last 20+ years.  My guess is that for those folks, there’s something appealing about having a “relic” that’s been around since day 1 of the album being on the scene.  And I suppose I kinda’ get that.  Chalking it up to different priorities for different collectors.

     

    1 hour ago, Tommy said:

    Yeah, I think it mainly boils down to the person being able to flex that they are "more of a fan" for owning the OG. Tickles the same nerve as owning a colored copy vs std black I assume

    For a lot of early metal stuff (Sabbath, Maiden, Metallica especially) those first presses really do sound significantly better than most other presses. Usually specifically the European first presses of them.

     

    I go back and forth on whether I care about 1st presses or not, but when it's the best sounding it's the one I want.

     

    I'd definitely trade off my Baroness - Red 1st press though. Don't care much about that.

  3. 1 hour ago, stl_ben said:

    It was released 19 years ago (plus like 3 years of touring).  But yeah I would agree on anything good after that being hard to find.

    Ah, ok. Thought it came out in 2002 or 2003. Warning forward was just way too polished sounding for me. There are a couple bangers and a couple decent songs throughout the next few albums but meh. I don't need to buy a full record for one or two good songs. Running out of space!

  4. 4 hours ago, Fowty Dollaz said:

    Ordered from 1234go. Then I heard the song. I appreciate the sentiment of the lyrics and the video (to a degree), but what an absolute dogshit song (no offense if you like it, I was really hoping to). 

    I genuinely miss liking Green Day songs. 

    Maybe this will be an outlier and the rest will be awesome 🤞

    My guy.

    Your optimism is appreciated, but what in the last 25 years leads you to believe that might be the case?

  5. 5 hours ago, throwgncpr said:

    This pressing epitomizes the bullshit the vinyl industry has become now. Overpriced splatter record that sounds like trash. I was excited that this album finally got a pressing, but totally deflated when I put this on the turntable. I really wish we would focus less on what these discs look like and more on what they sound like...

    Overpriced, sure, I agree. It sounds fine, I didn't expect a full analog remaster. Like the other person said, sounds just like my OG copy sounds.

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist