Jump to content

throwgncpr

Members
  • Posts

    2,530
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by throwgncpr

  1. 8 minutes ago, xfactor675 said:

    I wasn't bashing ltj for this, more like deluxe copies in general. 

     

    Fake demand might not be the right term for what I meant, but I exactly meant what you said in your last paragraph. The label's sole intention with these is to make it more desirable again, and also want to milk the same people again who has the og version, and yet these songs never really worth anything at all, and has zero effort from the band/label. 

    B-sides are obviously different, but on that I agree with you, release it as a 7".

     

    I also never said you are dumb for your opinion btw. 

    I never claimed you said that. It's all good.

    My point is, that for a lot of bands, demos, alternate takes, and b-sides can be absolute treasures. I hate when really great material in this category is relegated to digital only. For quite a few bands, I jump on the Deluxe versions that come out and then sell my regular LP if the audio quality is similar. I'm not a variant collector. I just want the music on vinyl in the best quality as possible.

    For Less Than Jake, yeah, I'm not really interested. To be frank, I don't like most of their post 90s material. But, to claim that the band is milking people by making this available is a little silly. Nobody is holding a gun to the consumer's head and making them buy these releases. If people buy it, that's on those people.

    All of the weird quirks about the modern vinyl pressing industry are completely consumer driven. If people weren't buying these deluxe editions, bands wouldn't invest the time and money in making them available.

  2. 2 minutes ago, xfactor675 said:

    Are you really putting on a record to listen to a specific song's demo, live or acoustic version?  Maybe I'm way too lazy but these songs are meant to be played on a crapy airpod while commuting to work, but in that case I'd still rather just listen to the album version. I don't know for me these are all 2nd tier material which don't deserve the effort putting them out physically, especially for marking them as "deluxe" while ruining for example the original artwork for another round of cashgrab. Also i'd never double, the worst part is if I don't have the original, most of the time don't buy these deluxes either, as I wanf to have it beyond the og circumstances. So im for keep repressing the og material as long as there is demand, if  there is not, don't make fake demand by releasing a 14th anniversary deluxe editions. Long rant sorry. 

    For Less Than Jake? No. But for many artists, yeah, I love their demos and alternate versions.

    Again, no one is forcing you to double dip. They are not creating "fake demand." WTF even is that? If people buy it, there is demand...

    I highly doubt that this version will replace the regular album moving forward in subsequent presses.

    Chastising a band for releasing music on physical media, in a forum about physical media is dumb. There are what, at least 12 variants/presses of this album? People can still easily purchase the regular album if that is what they prefer...

  3. 27 minutes ago, xfactor675 said:

    Deluxe editions are the cancer of physical formats. So pointless and stupid. Do you have demos,  bedroom acoustic versions, etc cool story, put it on bandcamp for pay what you want, but don't do a 2xlp, alternate cover cashgrab few years after the initial release... 

    Kind of a dumb argument. I get more annoyed when there is material that I would love to have on vinyl, but it's only available digitally. I can see how the double dip can be annoying, and a better solution might be just to throw those on a 7" or 12" EP that people could buy separately. No one is forcing you to double dip though...

    More cancerous is only making albums available as super low runs of ridiculous color variants.

  4. How many times has LLO and Mare been pressed though in recent years? At least twice. I think folks may be underestimating the demand for Sagarmatha. Further, given how difficult it is to get things pressed these days, and how difficult and expensive it is to get licenses to press Appleseed's back catalog, I wouldn't blame Graveface for wanting to do a larger press and have some on hand for the future instead of dealing with the expensive hustle.

  5. 1 hour ago, Derek™ said:

    So relieved to not be tempted by another copy of this one.  Personally find the reimagined art and variant to be kinda’ whack.

    https://theappleseedcast.square.site/product/the-appleseed-cast-peregrine-2023-vinyl-reissue/33?cs=true&cst=custom

    Every fucking time with Appleseed Cast. For the most part, I liked the new artwork that Graveface did, but it would be really nice if we could just get the original art.

    I hate the cheesy artwork used for the Ring Wars reissue. I want to see the OG cover with that kid's wonky face...

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist