lemongoat Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 I know they "monitor" everything, but I think you think they do far more than they do. If they arrested every guy doing what Klein did they would not have time to do anything else. In this thread there is a quote that possessing child pornography is not even jail time, it's a fine. And you think the government is using their time monitoring the offenders? I'm sure there is some sort of sub-division in the CIA and/or FBI that works on child pornography cases. But I just don't think skype sessions catch their attention. At least without being made aware beforehand. And the fact that they don't even know who these girls are suggests that they weren't aware beforehand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jase Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Erghhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 AND/OR AND/OR jail time/fine. meaning Jailtime AND/OR a fine. so sure, someone COULD just get off with a fine for having child porn, but they COULD go to jail AND get a fine. unfortunately for him, strict liability in statutory rape cases do not care about whether or not the defendant believed the females were of majority age. I read that earlier, but this isnt statutory rape because the ages are below 14 and just lewd acts, right? or is all one in the same in the legal realm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smwalsh6 Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 I'm thinking his ex-wife found some videos of him chatting with some questionably aged girls and turned that shit in. Dude's lawyer said she's using this case as a pawn in their custody battle. Nothing wins a custody case like turning in incriminating videos of your ex-husband getting weird with tweens. xadamhudsonx 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futures Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Or she could've turned it in because getting weird with tweens is illegal whether custody rights are involved or not. Princess Logan, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯, lonesomexloveus and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipsterasfolk Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 "It's my heart that burns of wickedness I stole your youth and ran with it" hmmmmm..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smwalsh6 Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Or she could've turned it in because getting weird with tweens is illegal whether custody rights are involved or not Yea, either way that's some fucked up shit to be doing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xadamhudsonx Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Nothing wins a custody case like turning in incriminating videos of your ex-husband getting weird with tweens. Ha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billya Posted March 13, 2014 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 It's pretty funny that the mods/admin changed the title of this thread. They can't take care of pressing matters at hand, but it's good to see that THAT was a priority, because the first half of this thread didn't have anything to do with the original title. If you're going to turn the topic title into some kind of tabloid headline, take my name off of it. pushbacktosquare 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Logan Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Or she could've turned it in because getting weird with tweens is illegal whether custody rights are involved or not. Yup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhulud Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 ^^ Easy there, tiger. Mods/Admins didn't change the thread title. OP changed it. billya and Tommy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billya Posted March 13, 2014 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 ^^ Easy there, tiger. Mods/Admins didn't change the thread title. OP changed it. I am the OP. I didn't change it. KennyFuckingPowers, Brevity38, sacredheart and 8 others 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhulud Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Awwwwwww hell. Missed that. Oops! I know it wasn't me. I am hoping it wasn't Rambo then. Damnit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 I am the OP. I didn't change it. BOOM. Satan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhulud Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 IN MY FACE!!!! Brevity38, Tommy and ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billya Posted March 13, 2014 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 Awwwwwww hell. Missed that. Oops! I know it wasn't me. I am hoping it wasn't Rambo then. Damnit. Figures. One more nail in that coffin. I had a feeling you didn't do it anyway, Juan. pushbacktosquare 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shitty Rambo Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Figures. One more nail in that coffin. I had a feeling you didn't do it anyway, Juan. I did because the topic has changed. If you're upset then I'll change it back. tittus and horrorbusiness138 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horrorbusiness138 Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Yea, either way that's some fucked up shit to be doing. This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 I did because the topic has changed. If you're upset then I'll change it back. I don't understand how you are still a mod. onlettingjoe, sacredheart, KennyFuckingPowers and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacredheart Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I don't understand how you are still a mod. normally I dont agree with you often, but have an upvote for this. KennyFuckingPowers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedvigilante Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 cannon.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewfro Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2014/03/21/2983756/steve-klein-new-found-glory-arrest.html#storylink=cpy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 He has been charged with seven felonies, which allege the online incidents occurred between 2010 and 2012 with victims who were 14 and 15 years old. The charges include five counts of lewd act on a child, plus one count of contact with a minor with intent to commit a sex offense and one count of possession of child pornography. so gross, what the fuck man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shitty Rambo Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Figures. One more nail in that coffin. I had a feeling you didn't do it anyway, Juan. I don't understand how you are still a mod. normally I dont agree with you often, but have an upvote for this. Brock N Roll, Tommy, castaway and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 This GIF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.