Tommy Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 23 minutes ago, DOMAN127 said: It was a complete joke Pretty much http://content.jwplatform.com/previews/kIzvqqPv-necgKPaX Edited February 16, 2017 by Tommy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nancy_raygun Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 40 minutes ago, Tommy said: Pretty much http://content.jwplatform.com/previews/kIzvqqPv-necgKPaX It's weird that that video ends up with the Rolling Stone logo, but doesn't include any of the quotes they use in the article with the exact same name. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/18-wtf-moments-from-trumps-unhinged-press-conference-w467518 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAXXX Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 BITCH I'M BACK OUT MY COMA Tommy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAXXX Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 27 days, 8 hours, and not one pic of a vagina costume? i expected more from you guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vool Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Not sure if I'm happy or sad that your return means the end of the Russian Emo-fake account .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinyl addict Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 On 2/7/2017 at 5:57 PM, Carly Rae Jepsen said: 6 hours ago, WAXXX said: 27 days, 8 hours, and not one pic of a vagina costume? i expected more from you guys. Who is ever going to take that seriously. They all look like a bunch of idiots. Don't forget about the Pussy hats too. They are just making light of the situation, which isn't helping there "cause". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futures Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 On 2/17/2017 at 6:56 AM, vinyl addict said: Who is ever going to take that seriously. They all look like a bunch of idiots. Don't forget about the Pussy hats too. They are just making light of the situation, which isn't helping there "cause". Is this a serious comment? Also, *their Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinyl addict Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 53 minutes ago, futures said: Is this a serious comment? Also, *their Yes it's a serious comment. Are you going to take anyone seriously if they are talking to you while wearing g a pussy costume? Or how about a pussy hat? Oops on the "their", I'm usually a stickler for that one too, but thanks for the grammar lesson on the vinyl forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bladewillisisdead Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 They're asking for it. Just look at the way they're dressed! daegor, abovetheearth, THE_James_Champ and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesse Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Phft, women..who takes them seriously anyway, amirightbros? Sandwichesrightbros? They'dbehappierwithoutbirthcontrolrightbros? Grabembythepussyrightbros? You guys are the best, bros. BBBBRRRROOOOOOOSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Um, WH bans DailyMail.com, the BBC, the New York Times, and CNN from a briefing? this is kind of big news. WAXXX 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 minute ago, abovetheearth said: this is kind of big fake news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Just now, Tommy said: what'd i miss? (serious question) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 minute ago, abovetheearth said: what'd i miss? (serious question) Nothing at all, just making a joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 damn. im so uptight these days I cant even tell. thought there were later reports on something. Sad Heart 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daegor Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, abovetheearth said: Um, WH bans DailyMail.com, the BBC, the New York Times, and CNN from a briefing? this is kind of big news. Yup. Like, really big news. Also, the whole thing with the the privatized prison system and wanting to roll back on legal pot is a huge thing too. If anyone doubted that Trump was in this to make himself rich, I don't see how you can't connect the dots now. Tommy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nancy_raygun Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, abovetheearth said: Um, WH bans DailyMail.com, the BBC, the New York Times, and CNN from a briefing? this is kind of big news. Also LA Times, Buzzfeed, and Politico. Associated Press and Time boycotted the briefing as soon as they found out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 (edited) Breitbart front row now. Have they rec'd credentials yet? Edited February 24, 2017 by abovetheearth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAXXX Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 18 hours ago, abovetheearth said: Um, WH bans DailyMail.com, the BBC, the New York Times, and CNN from a briefing? this is kind of big news. bigly news. how are we going to figure out what trump says at a briefing without CNN telling us? vinyl addict and Tommy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovetheearth Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Nowhere near the point. Sad Heart, Tom Delonge's UFO, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sad Heart Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 1 hour ago, abovetheearth said: Nowhere near the point. Seriously. That's probably the most arrogant thing I've seen on here in a while. Tom Delonge's UFO and WAXXX 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantdance Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Is WAXX a living meme? DecayToDeath and The Vool 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shitty Rambo Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 I like my buddy Daniel's opinion on the matter... "Honestly, some say this is censorship, but this is just the other side of the coin that is the relationship that the press has with the White House administration. When Obama was in office they traded admiration and praise for access, secret intelligence sources, and overall whitewashing through the guise of information. While during the campaign they traded access for praise of hillary and demonization of Trump. Now they're dealing with the demon, it's not about censorship or morality, but revenge. While yes, having inconsistent standards for different outlets is unfair, when has the state ever been fair about anything? Now the press knows how the public should feel." Tommy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nancy_raygun Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 That's an interesting take. But the issue isn't so much why the administration did it and more that it happened. It's pretty clear it was revenge. That's just not something Im okay with, regardless of the "side" the news organization is on. I think it was wrong for news organizations to demonized Trump during the election - they were obviously doing it for ratings. But it's doubling wrong for a president to deny access to press briefings based on how critical a news outlet is of an administration. And it flies fully in the face of Trumps promise to unify the country. IMO he has done little to nothing to calm the concerns of the majority of voters who cast their ballot to elect his opponent. This is just another in a long line of stunts pulled in the last month to further politically polarize the people. cantdance 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Delonge's UFO Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, Shitty Rambo said: I like my buddy Daniel's opinion on the matter... "Honestly, some say this is censorship, but this is just the other side of the coin that is the relationship that the press has with the White House administration. When Obama was in office they traded admiration and praise for access, secret intelligence sources, and overall whitewashing through the guise of information. While during the campaign they traded access for praise of hillary and demonization of Trump. Now they're dealing with the demon, it's not about censorship or morality, but revenge. While yes, having inconsistent standards for different outlets is unfair, when has the state ever been fair about anything? Now the press knows how the public should feel." The Obama administration also had struggles with the press. The idea that "they traded admiration and praise for access, secret intelligence sources, and overall whitewashing" has no grounding in reality. Maybe you can point me elsewhere, but I haven't seen anything. From the New Yorker article: "The Obama White House has hardly been immune to complaints about access and its treatment of the press. The last eight years have been marked by an escalating cat-and-mouse game between a communications staff that has constantly sought new ways to directly communicate with the public and a corps of White House reporters who see the efforts as a manipulative attempt to limit their access. Obama’s early use of Twitter and Facebook to make news was seen as controversial, as was the White House’s use of its own videographer to record the President in settings to which the press had no access. The White House’s production of “West Wing Week,” an in-house “news” show with a Pravda feel, was mocked by reporters. And Obama’s use of non-traditional venues for major interviews—“The Tonight Show,” “The Daily Show,” “Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown,” “Running Wild with Bear Grylls,” and ESPN—often frustrated reporters." Edit: tense of word Edited February 25, 2017 by Carly Rae Jepsen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.