Jump to content

New Collector - Need Advice on Defintion of "First Pressing"


Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, dlc3172 said:

I believe vinyl collectors would want first presses for the same reason that book collectors would want first editions and for the same reason that baseball card collectors want rookie cards.  It's the "first" of something, so for most collectors, it's the version they want.

That’s fine and all… but at the end of the day, there is music on these things.  I kind of view them closer to CDs than trading cards.  As far as functionality goes, anyway.

This argument doesn’t apply to the (many) scenarios where a 1st press was actually handled with more love and care than a cash-grab repress.  I totally get the draw there.  But ultimately if I can do an A:B comparison between an OG copy from 1983 and a 2023 press, and they each sound comparable, I’m gonna’ shell out $30 for a clean copy that hasn’t been handled for 40 years.

But like Randy mentioned above, superior sound quality is often tied to OG presses, especially with classic metal records… so I completely grasp that.

I just think there’s a lot of cases where a record may be pressed in ‘83, then ‘85, then ‘99, and then 2023… and of those, the 2023 may be trash, but the 80s and 90s presses would all sound comparably good.  If I had a ‘99 press, I wouldn’t feel like I needed an OG ‘83 copy, but I know people who don’t agree.  I guess that’s all I'm getting at.  I know my view on it isn’t accepted by all collectors or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Derek™ You also mentioned something kind of interesting earlier too, not necessarily at play in OP's scenario, but relevant when comparing first presses to represses. Sometimes represses come with additional material, like new artwork, demos, re-recorded tracks, etc. So the "first press" aspect of owning an old record becomes even more nuanced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fowty Dollaz said:

I also think that OP had a genuine question and came to the right place to learn a little, not just collect data. Welcome new folks!

I'm with you. This one felt sincere to me (and it looks like most folks here) so they didn't get the snark brigade.

 

Plus a bunch of people learned that you can search matrices on discogs, and I'm glad they did. It's the only way I search when I'm adding stuff now, especially older stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TheGhostOfRandySavage said:

 

Plus a bunch of people learned that you can search matrices on discogs, and I'm glad they did. It's the only way I search when I'm adding stuff now, especially older stuff.

Yeah, I took a shot on searching matrices one day for some classic rock hand-me-downs. I was thrilled it worked because those are nightmarish to sort through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great topic. I'm glad someone brought it up, newbie or OG, it doesn't matter. Yeah, I've always wondered how much the difference in pressing plants and runs matter if it's from the original year as far as price goes. I'm sure it matters if there's a much larger run at one than another, but how would you find that out anyway? It's not like there's a guide out there to let you know how many were printed at each plant. 

I do wish there was another source besides Discogs that you could look up scarce variations, and one-offs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheGhostOfRandySavage said:

I'd definitely trade off my Baroness - Red 1st press though. Don't care much about that.

Baller press of a baller record.

2 hours ago, phillybhatesme said:

@Derek™ You also mentioned something kind of interesting earlier too, not necessarily at play in OP's scenario, but relevant when comparing first presses to represses. Sometimes represses come with additional material, like new artwork, demos, re-recorded tracks, etc. So the "first press" aspect of owning an old record becomes even more nuanced. 

Yeah, I think I called that out though.  I have OG copies of stuff that I chose to not sell off or "upgrade" because the reissues contain more content (I wasn't interested in) spread across the same number of discs, or switched up the album art, and thus there's some added value in holding onto - or desiring - the 1st press.

I think the best example to support where I'm coming from is Interpol's Turn on the Bright Lights.  As a disclaimer, I will say that I've never owned an OG press from 2002.  I'm sure it sounds at least serviceable, since pressing plants gave a bit more of a shit about their product in the early 00s.  Discogs reviews had been hit-or-miss for it – not that I treat those as a beaming source of truth – and subsequent represses just seemed to sound worse and worse, including Newbury's fancy splatter variant from 2017.  That version was pretty desirable for collector's, but sounded like butt.

Then in 2022, a whole 20 years after the album debuted on vinyl, it finally got a double LP press handled through Vinyl Me Please.  45 RPM.  Beautiful, sturdy packaging.  I know there's a boxset version of that record (which still features the album on 1 LP), so from a perspective of actually enjoying the music and packaging, that VMP press is the definitive one for me.  But despite that, even a year later, there are people seeking OG copies.  Someone paid $117 for a copy just last weekend.  Different strokes for different folks and all that, but that'll never compute for me.

Anyways.  Hopefully no one misconstrued my tone or anything in this thread.  OP was coherent and presented a fair-enough question.  That's a lot more than we get from brand new accounts on VC anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only really care about first pressings when it's a huge nostalgia record for me, and I was a fan of it on day one. I like knowing that these records have existed for about as long as I've loved the music. The two examples that come to mind are Deja Entendu and Good Mourning. It'd be nice to own those some day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HardlineKid said:

I only really care about first pressings when it's a huge nostalgia record for me, and I was a fan of it on day one. I like knowing that these records have existed for about as long as I've loved the music. The two examples that come to mind are Deja Entendu and Good Mourning. It'd be nice to own those some day.

Shocked Oh No GIF by Yêu Lu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HardlineKid said:

I only really care about first pressings when it's a huge nostalgia record for me, and I was a fan of it on day one. I like knowing that these records have existed for about as long as I've loved the music. The two examples that come to mind are Deja Entendu and Good Mourning. It'd be nice to own those some day.

Found one for sale!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×

AdBlock Detected

spacer.png

We noticed that you're using an adBlocker

Yes, I'll whitelist