TFP Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 You know, I would really like to know why the labels were done like LP1/Side A LP2 Side A etc. and not A,B,C,D? It is overall just confusing! thedillon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amnstypls Posted March 21, 2013 Author Share Posted March 21, 2013 one slot left! next email I get gets the last one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amnstypls Posted March 21, 2013 Author Share Posted March 21, 2013 thedillon got the last slot! really sorry again to anyone who will inevitably email me after this with their info... line had to be drawn somewhere. thedillon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shitty Rambo Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Awesome. Ready to pay Patrick whenever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrewest Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Really pumped about this! Especially now that I finally got my copy and can actually see just how ridiculously bad that cover is. Such a shame too because the actual records look so sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amnstypls Posted March 21, 2013 Author Share Posted March 21, 2013 all PM's have been responded to and deleted. man, this was more work than I thought it would be, and I'm not even doing the printing! anyway, the next step is for me to put together a pretty spreadsheet with everyone's info to get to patrick. we also need a DESIGN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedillon Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 yesssss! pushbacktosquare 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomfiend Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Just got home, been gone all day, this sucks, I obviously miss out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daysaves Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Stooooked for this. Super cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjb2k1 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 art on the back looks fine, heh no issues with the label on the first press because that's where the DTR logo was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedillon Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 I'm gonna try and get some hi-res logos and such from richard or randy... will let you guys know what I can come up with 213041284s 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow_Tree_Records Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 I'm in for one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow_Tree_Records Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Nevermind just read the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrickemmons Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 My finch copy comes today hopefully! The foldover will likely not be a complete foldover like the ones I did for the 1st pressing of Cassino because I end up having to print almost to the very edge of the paper and it's a pain with the screen sizes I'm using right now. Once someone can help get a design going we can make it work out awesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Hundred Fifty-Two Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Over-under on how many of these covers will be sold on eBay in the next three months. 20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamover Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 you guys would rather have a $20 fold over screen print with your record than a blown-out gatfold jacket housing your record? Does it matter that much if it just sits on a shelf? smailtronic 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaxcowboyx Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Over-under on how many of these covers will be sold on eBay in the next three months. 20. yea, i was gonna guess at least 1/3 haha, so 25. another question is how much would people freak out and pay when they see some badass finch screenprint they've never heard of on eBay. maybe names should be written onto the jacket so people can be outed and shamed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefchino Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 yea, i was gonna guess at least 1/3 haha, so 25. another question is how much would people freak out and pay when they see some badass finch screenprint they've never heard of on eBay. maybe names should be written onto the jacket so people can be outed and shamed If its numbered on the front and we keep tabs on who got what that could help daysaves 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youmightbewrong Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 you guys would rather have a $20 fold over screen print with your record than a blown-out gatfold jacket housing your record? Does it matter that much if it just sits on a shelf? You do realize that Patrick volunteered to do this for a mere $3 shipping fee and nothing more, right? (unless we want to donate more for the cause, which I'm sure most of us will do) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 you guys would rather have a $20 fold over screen print with your record than a blown-out gatfold jacket housing your record? Does it matter that much if it just sits on a shelf? probably not in the long run but its not like HT/whoever is going to do anything to fix their mistake. if a small label did something like that they'd be crucified on here and everyone would expect a replacement (ie. ETR's starting line sleeves). plus patrick volunteered to print some up for free... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provee Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Man am I glad that an extra 25 are going to be made. Stoked to be a part of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamover Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 You do realize that Patrick volunteered to do this for a mere $3 shipping fee and nothing more, right? (unless we want to donate more for the cause, which I'm sure most of us will do) no i did not realize that. in that case, i see no harm. i read something about $20 before. that's nice of patrick. what i don't get is, a bunch of hot topic presses sound like shit and people shrug it off, but when the artwork of an old record is too pixelated (probably because higher-res artwork doesn't exist), people band together to make new covers. priorities just seem out of whack. One Hundred Fifty-Two 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaxcowboyx Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 no i did not realize that. in that case, i see no harm. i read something about $20 before. that's nice of patrick. what i don't get is, a bunch of hot topic presses sound like shit and people shrug it off, but when the artwork of an old record is too pixelated (probably because higher-res artwork doesn't exist), people band together to make new covers. priorities just seem out of whack. Being on vinyl doesn't make shitty music sound any better anyways. and a fair amount of hot topic presses are for shitty music stirringthepot.jpg firefoxUSSR and dreamover 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amnstypls Posted March 21, 2013 Author Share Posted March 21, 2013 no i did not realize that. in that case, i see no harm. i read something about $20 before. that's nice of patrick. what i don't get is, a bunch of hot topic presses sound like shit and people shrug it off, but when the artwork of an old record is too pixelated (probably because higher-res artwork doesn't exist), people band together to make new covers. priorities just seem out of whack. Kinda tough to band together to press a better sounding vinyl. Derek™, johnpdillard, themeconspiracy and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themeconspiracy Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 no i did not realize that. in that case, i see no harm. i read something about $20 before. that's nice of patrick. what i don't get is, a bunch of hot topic presses sound like shit and people shrug it off, but when the artwork of an old record is too pixelated (probably because higher-res artwork doesn't exist), people band together to make new covers. priorities just seem out of whack. it's also been established, at least in this case, that higher res artwork does in fact exist since the cover on the original vinyl press of this looked fine. the center labels also say "what is it to burn," so....clearly, the art department was slacking hardcore on this release. plus, patrick is awesome and makes pretty things...and who doesn't like pretty things? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.