caninesapien Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Got my RSD release and sounds amazing. Any differences with this release? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidamnesiac Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Nothing like getting up early and waiting it the rain for something that will be readily available later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcpherson123 Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Nothing like getting up early and waiting it the rain for something that will be readily available later. Better to just let it slide, man. Its never gonna change with the major label big sellers. Nirvana stuff will never stop being pressed and repressed as long as it sells and technically you did get something different. The RSD release is a 3xLP with an LP of b-sides, right? This is just the core album. I know the reason you bought it is for the core album for the most part anyway but it technically is a different release in the grand scheme. There's no sense being upset or disappointed. Big ticket RSD items will always be repressed later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psus2h Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 McPherson RSD was the 2013 "remix" of the album. It was a 2xLP that was at the time only exclusive to RSD. I agree with you though, RSD is a tough one most of that stuff just keeps getting pumped out. Except for things that people probably still want like hoarmoaning - Nirvana which they have not reissued since. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam10647 Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Better to just let it slide, man. Its never gonna change with the major label big sellers. Nirvana stuff will never stop being pressed and repressed as long as it sells and technically you did get something different. The RSD release is a 3xLP with an LP of b-sides, right? This is just the core album. I know the reason you bought it is for the core album for the most part anyway but it technically is a different release in the grand scheme. Nope no B sides just a 2xLP 45 speed 2013 mix of the album. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoney Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 This (the 2LP 2013 mix) is now up on amazon for ~$36: http://tinyurl.com/nirvanautero2lp psus2h 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horrorbusiness138 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 This (the 2LP 2013 mix) is now up on amazon for ~$36: http://tinyurl.com/nirvanautero2lp Much better of a price, but still more than I'm personally willing to spend. I'll pick this up when I can get it for $15. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
828321 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Got my RSD release and sounds amazing. Any differences with this release? Same stampers, so if anything these black covered RSD issues as production continued with stampers wearing out will get progressivbely worse towards the end of the run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
828321 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 If I understand correctly, the 20th Anniversary is a different mix from the 2013 Albini mix. This repress SRC speaks of is of the 20th Anniversary mix, without the 3rd LP that it originally came with. Same mix, both use the same lacquers from the Abbey remastering sessions last year. Cut to DMM. http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2013/09/25/nirvanas-in-utero-2013-mix-examined http://www.nirvana.com/news/nirvana-in-utero-20th-anniversary-reissue-out-september-24 - read the second bullet point. Stories like this: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/nirvanas-in-utero-2013-mix-headed-to-vinyl-20131009 ... have misled some into thinking that the anniversary edition and the 2013 remix are different cuts, they;re not. How do you continue to be the least knowledgeable, but most sure of himself person in this topic? It blows my mind. Read the full thread and you'd be better informed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nothingnatural Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I'm confused. Are you trying to say the 2013 Mix with the black cover is the same as the 20th Anniversary 3LP? If so, they are not the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
828321 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 The only musical difference is that the Anniversary Edition has the bonus LP. The musical content of the 45rpm records are both pressed from the same DMM master made by Pallas GmbH in Germany for Pallas USA in association with Furnace Mfg. They come from difference stampers though, but that is about it. All it is, is a stripped down version sans the bonus disc marketed in a new sleeve and a new subtitle. Similar to when Alive released The Big Come Up in a negative sleeve. It;s just a contrast and helps market the item further. All they;ve done is extend the sales life of the record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc32137 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 You're wrong. Disc 2 of the CD version had the 2013 mixes, which were omitted from the vinyl release and were released separately for RSD Black Friday. Here's a track-by-track rundown of what's different in the 2013 mix:http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2013/09/25/nirvanas-in-utero-2013-mix-examined?showFullText=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timsimmons Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 No. They are 2 different mixes (I know because I have them both). The yellow 3LP (2x45/1x33) copy with the b-sides/rareties LP is the original In Utero remastered. The black copy(2x45) that originally came out on RSD:BF is a new mix Albini created from the original tapes. This is a re-release of that. The confusion is created because the remastering AND the new mix were both done and released in 2013 and have been labeled as such. In addition there has been so much talk of the "Albini mix" of IU over the years, that a new mix also done by Albini confuses matters. Also people not knowing the difference between what a mix and master is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apeman Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 The engravings at the run out grooves are different. Compare the A-sides from each set and you have the answer.http://www.discogs.com/Nirvana-In-Utero/release/4927358http://www.discogs.com/Nirvana-In-Utero-2013-Mix/release/5146137 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deletedunknown Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 How do you continue to be the least knowledgeable, but most sure of himself person in this topic? It blows my mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugareggs Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 The 2013 REMASTERED version of Dumb has cello's in the chorus. The 2013 REMIXED version of dumb has no cellos. Boom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timsimmons Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Hilarious. I knew that there was confusion in the thread earlier. Pretty funny its the same guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stranaspank Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Soooo...now that that is sorted out, should I buy the 3LP, the new RSD Albini mix, and the ORG version, or is that redundant? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timsimmons Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 In regards to the 3LP vs ORG pressings I have both. I thought the sound quality was comparable (the anniversary was slightly better)I think it really comes down to if you want to play the album on 1 LP at 33 or 2 at 45 but also get another disc of pretty essential Nirvana tracks. And price too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throwgncpr Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 What it really comes down to is if you want both mixes. They're different mixes, so... I have the Albini RSD release, and that will be my go-to copy to listen to, but I'll probably pick up the other 3 LP set at some point if I get a decent price on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timsimmons Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Yeah, its not redundant to have both the 2013 mix and either ORG or the 3LP Anniversary release. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stranaspank Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I definitely want both mixes, so if the 3LP sounds as good as the ORG, and I get the bonus disc, I'll just get both of the presses that came out last year. Thanks buds! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
828321 Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 I humbly apologise for my error. nothingnatural 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morfiend Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 I'm curious about the RSD Albini Mix but I already have the 3LP Anniversary Edition, an ORG press and a first press (all sound great) so I just can't justify buying another copy. It has to end some time lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timsimmons Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 It will. After you buy the 2013 mix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.